Essay Example on The Fundamental Postulate of Kelly's Theory: Constructive Alternivism

Introduction

The assumption of Kelly in constructive alternivism is that events’ alternative interpretations are regularly accessible to a person. Individuals usually interpret experiences as subjective since they try to align the experiences to their individual constructs, and not focusing on objective reality (Baird & Donovan, 2020). The world’s interpretations can be replaced or revised.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Kelly’s theory considers the driving force of human conduct as teleological. The assumption is that the behavior depicted by people is formed from the anticipation of future results (Baird & Donovan, 2020).

Personal Construct Theory Supporting Corollaries

Construct corollary

An individual expects certain events through the construction of their replications.

Individuality corollary

This explains that individuals differ from one another based on their events’ construction (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Organization corollary

Every individual depicts characteristic evolution for their convenience in expecting events, a system of construction that embrace ordinal relationships between the constructs (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Choice corollary

This describes where an individual selects for himself the option in a dichotomized construct via which the individual expects the most significant possibility for definition and extension of their system (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Dichotomy corollary

A construction system of an individual is made up of a dichotomous constructs’ finite number (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Experience corollary

It describes the construction system of an individual is different as the person successively construes the events’ replication (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Range corollary

This explains that a construct is deemed suitable for the expectation of entirely limited events’ range (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Modulation corollary

It describes the differences in an individual’s construction system as limited by the constructs’ permeability where the variants lie in the range of convenience (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Commonality corollary

It explains the degree that an individual utilizes experience construction perceived a different person’s similar experience construction (Walker & Winter, 2007). Their psychological processes are deemed similar to those expressed by the other individual.

Fragmentation corollary

It describes that an individual is likely to successfully use various construction subsystems that are perceived as inferentially incompatible with one another (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Sociality corollary

This explains the degree that an individual usually construes the process of construction depicted by a different person, he or she is likely to play a key role in a social process and where he involves the other individual (Walker & Winter, 2007).

Peripheral Role and Core Role

The sociality corollary includes the concept of role. It is explained as the behavior pattern from the understanding we express towards the constructions of other people. An individual is perceived to have a core role and a variety of peripheral roles (Lester, 2009). The sense of identity of an individual is integral to his or her existence of their core role (Lester, 2009). Alternatively, the peripheral roles do not dominate the self-concept of a person.

Kelly’s point of view of threat

There are four well-known components in the majority of human distractions, including guilt, fear, threat and anxiety. According to Kelly, the threat is among the common factors in most of the disturbances in humans (Chiari, 2013). It is explained as individuals’ awareness that among our most fundamental constructs could experience significant manipulation.

Kelly’s point of view of anxiety

Kelly holds that anxiety includes one of the well-known factors in the majority of human disturbances (Chiari, 2013). He explains it as the awareness of a person that they lack enough skills to address new experience that they face.

Abnormal development by Kelly

Abnormal people are considered not in a position to validate individual constructs against their world’s experiences. They tend to cling on outdated constructs and fear the new constructs are likely to disrupt the world’s status quo. An unhealthy individual will distort or reject new approaches. The construction system of a person does not exist in future events, but entirely in the present. They are objected to the traditional classification of abnormalities’ system. The constructs are deemed as unique to an individual and not universal (Curtis & Kelley, 2016). Unhealthy personal constructs of an individual fail to pass the permeability test based on two ways; first, it is likely to be too flexible, and the individual is not in a position to adjust to the reality. The second way is that of the personal construct is too loose.

Conclusion

A client typically is involved in a particular preestablished role for several weeks. The role is played with the purpose of helping the client establish the exposed parts of the clients that they were not aware of in the past.

References

Baird, J. C., & Donovan, B. (2020). Constructive Alternativism and the Mind-Body Problem. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2020.1756014

Chiari, G. (2013). Emotion in personal construct theory: A controversial question. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 26(4), 249-261.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2013.812853

Curtis, D., & Kelley, L. (2016). Abnormal psychology: myths of crazy. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.

Lester, D. (2009). Emotions in personal construct theory: A review. Personal Construct Theory & Practice, 6, 90-98.

Walker, B. M., & Winter, D. A. (2007). The elaboration of personal construct psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 58.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085535