Essay Example on the Adoption of Human Rights: A Global Human Rights Architecture

Introduction

The adoption of human rights required effective implementation. The human rights architecture was developed based on the international mechanisms for human rights, the various treaty bodies as well as the periodic review states. Also, special procedures with effective mechanisms were used for overseeing human rights implementation. Globally, the regional mechanisms for human rights complimenting human rights have various mandates, processes as well as activities which shape the way human rights are implemented. The reporting systems also address the various warning for human rights while taking urgent actions for effective implementation. It ensures the imminent threats of human rights and its violations are addressed based on the recommendations from the regular and periodic reporting process. Consequently, it contributes to changes in the legal and policy framework, thus creating an enabling environment for protecting Human Rights (Scheinin, 2016). The state is entitled to reporting to the Human Rights based on the progress of meeting the obligations for human rights as well as commitments through critical self-assessment and monitoring the progress while identifying challenges and shortcomings in the implementation. The national reporting system for reporting and overseeing the Human Rights implementation has ensured its effective implementation through coordination, development of specific implementation plans as well as giving particular timeline and benchmark for the success of human rights.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Effectiveness of Reporting System for Overseeing the Implementation of Human Rights

The reporting systems for overseeing the implementation of Human Rights have been a success. Its functions of reporting and following up the application are based on engaging international, regional human rights mechanisms. It effectively communicates with global and local human rights in responding to urgent actions while facilitating visits. It also informs the stakeholder as well as the general public on human rights-based on the review by the international mechanism (Reif, 2017). By facilitating the national dialogue on the human rights situation, it ensures adequate preparation while maximizing engagement as well as the collection of information. The reporting system thus coordinates the collection of information as well as statistical data in reports based on the guidelines for the regional and international mechanisms. The treaty bodies and other reporting mechanisms facilitate the drafting of the state reports through formal follow up procedures corresponding to the individual communication and decisions.

The international mechanisms for overseeing effective implementation of human rights facilitate the involvement of the stakeholders for effective enforcement of human rights. Also, the judiciary collects and disseminates the judicial decisions relevant to the human freedom with the civil society, including groups of rights holders coordinating the follow up on the international and regional human rights (Mudgway, 2018). The system analyses the recommendations, thus identifies the responsibility of the State in ensuring the effective implementation of human rights. The progress of the application is based on the follow-up by the relevant systems. Planning and developing human rights is based on the policies with established strategies for the human rights institution.

Reporting the implementation of human rights has been active through the reporting systems creating awareness to the general public as well as civil society. The methods stimulate the healthy and sustainable dialogue that strengthens the international human right while protecting the system. The frequent reports entail different procedures with various mechanisms used to establish sustainable development as well as public health and labor rights. The reporting systems for the implementation of human rights has adopted the recommendation based on various condition. The treaty bodies for the reporting system considers individuals' complaints on the violation of their rights. The decisions taken in the implementation are based on the follow-up procedure with an international human rights mechanism focused on ratifications.

The periodic reporting on the human rights implementation reveals the emanating recommendations with the international mechanisms based on state capacity and political will. Therefore, the reporting mechanisms respond to the proposal through effective follow up that strengthens the ability of various bodies to deal with multiple questions of human rights. The growing concern of implementing human rights, the state has to adopt comprehensive implementation strategies with an efficient and sustainable approach that favor effective implementation (Sidoti, 2017). The reporting system follows up the systematization and rationalization for the prepared reports on human rights regionally and internationally. They coordinate the different government entities while empowering the ministries to develop a sustainable that ensures consultation with the civil society serving to strengthen the participatory and accountability of human rights-based governance.

The reporting system is grouped based on the order to establish a clear relationship for identifying the areas to institutionalize, thus its effectiveness. A detailed review from the reporting bodies implicit the various assumption giving a direct connection for the efficacy of a mechanism gives correlation for the effective implementation (Mudgway, 2018). Different types of reporting requirements signify the consideration for reporting effectiveness with the established human rights committee that gives extensive reports. The findings of the committee based on the used mechanisms reveal the effectiveness in communicating while addressing the implementation issues. The coordination of the arrangements ensures the dissemination of information with the organization and coordination that gathers data and information from various government entities.

The reporting system, through broad consultation, prepares a state report based on the contents as well as responsibility for the effective human rights implementation. The treaty bodies encourage the government to consult various stakeholders for the meaningful report on how to effectively implement human rights. The civil society, as well as professional groups and other stakeholders, are considered for consultation, which takes place in a diversified manner. The comments and recommendations are used in implementing the international human rights mechanisms with the information used for coordinating the committee. It promotes and protects human rights through the appropriate consultation, thus preparing the state on the report for the effectiveness of the human rights implementation. The consultation also forms a regular dialogue for the international mechanism, which provides the opportunity to adequately discuss the reports and responses while involving the disadvantaged and the marginalized groups. The State, therefore, becomes prepared for the periodic reports as well as reactions to provide accurate information as well as measures for implementing human rights. Consequently, issues identified are addressed based on the recommendations, thus strengthening the transparency and accountability of performing human rights.

The government entities, including the parliament and judiciary reports, ensure the follow-up recommendations which coordinate the activities for the implementation. The coordinated activities provide input for self-assessment and policy review for fulfilling the reporting obligations with the implementation recommendation for the regional human rights mechanisms. Coordination with the government entities ensures information is obtained for facilitating the report while encouraging accountability based on legislative policies (Scheinin, 2016). The coordination also ensures various means of implementing human rights are identified with human rights action plans developing the mechanisms with greater reliance.

Sufficient of the reporting systems for the reporting and following human rights entails a national framework that leads to reliable, continuous, and sustainable international and regional human rights. The reporting and follow up system acts as catalysts as well as pillars for effective implementation of human rights. They enhance knowledge as well as professionalism and sustainability for the improved and developed human rights within the government structures (Sidoti, 2017). The structured mechanisms stimulate regular dialogue among government entities and civil society based on its implementation. Proper assessment of the mechanisms facilitates the implementation policies that identified the gaps and challenges in the application while drawing attention to promote the domestic human rights legislation as well as the commitment by the state.

The treaty body systems that oversee the implementation of human rights reveals the significant challenges in the application. Through coordinated activities, it protects and promotes human rights while discussing matters of mutual concern. The systems respond to the various proposal while ensuring each body perform its mandate in monitoring the implementation process of human rights efficiently and effectively (Beate, 2018). The different reporting system functions together to ensure the common goal of implementing the human rights that protect and promote equity and equality are maintained. It is based on the relevant and practical support for protecting the human rights of the system. The systems, therefore, discuss the recommendations while addressing the issues that harmonize the reporting guidelines.

The reporting system enhances the efficiency and effectiveness of the treaty bodies that implement human rights through measures and procedures that ensure coordination and realization of better coordination. The systems also craft a coordinated approach for the renewed efforts that promote consistent and coherent implementation (Haasz, 2017). Through standardized reporting, the application of human rights. The systems streamline the guidelines on reporting based on the human rights instruments while minimizing the repetition of information from the state on the various methods for the process of implementation (LaForgia, 2016). The treaty system strengthens the human rights protection system with the reforms asserting enhancement of the protection system while reflecting on the norms of international human rights. The reporting systems, therefore, plays a crucial part in the global human rights protection system, thus ensuring effective implementation of human rights-based on the set norms. The system also provided useful follow-up recommendations that emanate from the treaty bodies for the well-focused practical application.

The national human rights institution involved in overseeing human rights implementation entails monitoring human rights based on international standards. The recommendations entail a legislative review based on consistent policies with human rights standards. It gives advises on the government on the necessary steps of implementing the human rights standards (Mudgway, 2018) fully. They provide inputs for the reports under the international human rights treaties while considering the alleged violation of human rights. They also offer potential resources to monitoring human rights implementation. The practical application prevents torture as well as other forms of ill-treatment through the established international bodies that oversee the human rights implementation.

Conclusion

The reporting system for ove...