Essay Example on Information Access vs. Information Recall: What Are the Differences?

Information access is the ability to retrieve information from storage devices. Information recall, on the other hand, is the power to use memory capabilities to remember data stored in mind. There are some distinctions between information recall and information access. While information recall depends on memory ability to retrieve information, information access on the hand depends on gadget's capabilities. Such devices include computers. In other words, data access is well represented by the machines, while information access is denoted by memory. The two types of information also vary based on their characteristics.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Information access entails accurate recording of the information as received from the source. Information recall, on the other hand, according to philosophers, records information based on the listener's ability. The information may, for instance, be changed to fit the audience's ability and be used in the future based on how the student stored it. Information access is, therefore, accurate when used in a later date while compared to information recall because it depends on reliable devices such as the computer, magazines, journals, and recordings.

Memory recall is limited to the capabilities of the individual (Loftus 123). The capacity of an individual's memory to store and retrieve information is significant in information recall. The individual brain capacity to code data is notwithstanding information access because the person receives information the way it was stored. Information recall is recorded on the blank slates, as argued by Locke's theory. Locke argues that a child's brains choose the type of information to store from the environment in which he or she is subjected. Aristotle, who is among the fathers of philosophy, also had an idea of information recall when he talked about the blank tablet.

Information recall is associated with the learning process. The student receives information from the surroundings and manipulates it during the storage for use in the future. The student records the data based on his or her understanding. Information access is not affected by time compared to information recall (Carver 168). In information recall, the message may change based on the duration for which the message will be retrieved. Long durations between the times of storage and retrieval may cause some critical elements of the data to be lost due to memory challenges. In information access, the accuracy of the data is a guarantee, provided that the storage device is in good condition (Carver 169). The information stored on devices can only be interrupted through malicious sabotage. Information recall, on the other hand, maybe unwillingly sabotaged through memory failure.

Information recall of visual images such as pictures can change to fit the individual's abilities and desires. Information access for visuals is original because the modes of retrieving the information can record the actual information through means such as printing, photography, and photocopying. Information access success, according (Carver 169), is determined by the structures that governed information storage centers such as libraries, archives, and museums. Information recall's success, on the other hand, solely depends on the individual's mental health and attitude (Loftus 132). Information policies such as free access to information and copyright govern information access in the universe. Information recall, on the other hand, is guided by human rights principles such as freedom of speech.

Occam's razor

Occam's razor is a philosophical principle that was established after the 12th century and widely associated with William of Occam. The rule suggests that the most straightforward illustration from a set is usually the most correct. The precept, however, does not state that the most straightforward instruction is often the most accurate. It only suggests that short instructions are probably the most correct and, therefore, does not require many assumptions. Occam's razor has its foundation on two principles originally defined in Latin. The first principle is the plurality. It states that the majority should be determined by necessity. The second principle is the principle of parsimony, which states that it does not make sense to work with more what we can do with less. It is significant to note that the policy does not make any proof. It is only a scientific tool for helping out to come up with the most appropriate solutions. Occam's razor has great significance in its use today. The principle, for example, finds its use currently in forensic researches (Akai 22).

Police detectives usually use the rule to settle on the most likely suspect for a criminal offense. The idea is essential in the universe today in institutions that work with a set of information. Occam's razor finds its use in many institutions that focus on improving quality because the rule's foundation is the philosophy that simplicity is perfection. The principle is also applicable in the study of other disciplines, such as physic science. The practice was used to arrive at the statement that the closer we get to travel in the speed of light is, the more we tend to slow (Akai 22). The Occam's razor also finds its extensive usage in computer programming today since writing the computer language is a complicated task (Akai 22). Programmers, therefore, use the shorted route to formulate an easily executable command.

Works Cited

Akai, Masami. "Is Occam's Razor Meaningful for Selecting Significant Outcome Items and to Narrow Down Question Numbers in a Psychometric Scale?." (2018): 1208-1210.

Carver, Amy L. "We are all reference librarians: Using communication to employ a philosophy of access for catalogers." College & research libraries news 63.3 (2019): 168-172.

Loftus, Geoffrey R., and Elizabeth F. Loftus. Human memory: The processing of information. Psychology Press, 2019.