Essay Example on Eight Men Out: 1919's White Sox Scandal

With elliptic conversations, side-glances and earth tones the movie Eight Men Out is an oddly unfocused movie wherein the year 1919, the White Sox team had a scandal. The stars accept to throw the World Series by taking payoffs from gamblers. Eight Men Out is a baseball expert film, an insider movie where the storytelling has appreciation on the old-fashioned Hollywood style. There is a lot of vignettes design early in the film to offer at that time professional baseball. The characters establishment is by intercutting in the movie with domestic and short personal scenes of the characters. An Old Roman emerges as the villain Charles Comiskey; he treats his players like slaves and is the owner of the club. With the above facts, the essay will report on a movie review of the Eight Men Out film.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The team is one of the unhappiest ones to win a pennant in my case. They are bitter at their teammates and Charles Comiskey who is their penny pincher owner; this is not a right image. The owner, who is also the villain, sent flat champagne to the team when they won the pennant. It is evident that the film argues the team to be the most exceptional baseball team of the era, but this could have changed. They would have been the greatest team if there were no scandals and proper respect from Comiskey. It is unfair after he promises bonuses of $10,000 to a pitcher who wins thirty games, but after the second last game, he would bench the pitcher so that the player would not receive the payment.

Additionally, money is on offer to some players by the gamblers who take this opportunity as an advantage to throw the series. Much promised was in compromise, as the players were not offered enough. Two characters in the movie try to play their best, the great shoeless Joe Jackson and Buck weaver at the last minutes but unfortunately, a deficit of three to one was impossible for the Sox team. Major gamblers created the deficit when they come to join in and out; they lost focus, arguing that the deal was to going to involve everyone thereby making cash offers. It was hard to imagine and fooling anyone because a good team was making deliberate and not subtle errors thereby throwing the game. The truth finally breaks out after two years and suing of the Sox on multiple counts. The result is a human tragedy as the jury finds the eight men innocent but Landis, the commissioner of baseball, suspends them for life.

Ethical DilemmaThe institutional ethics and the ethics of the court colluded when Joe Jackson ended his career by the scandal, and he had the highest play score from average season batting of .351 to .371 in the World Series. The other player is Eddie Cicotte who during the regular season had 1.82, and in the series, it inflated to 2.19 for the Sox in the three games he pitched. The statistics were ignored, and it is evident that Cicotte cheated while Jackson did the opposite. With the institutional ethics, the commission of major league ignored the jury's decision and installed this by his friends following the scandal. The fix was an illusion of creation charging the eight as guilty on one same level but not including high corporate offices. The truth is that without appropriate evidence, no institution should sanction a player. The philosophy that these sanctions are based on is legal positivism; the legislator who is the first commission of major league Judge Kennesaw Landis makes the laws. The content of punishment does not have ethical justification and questions of humanity and justice.

References

Bernstein, D. (1990). Movie Reviews: Eight Men Out. The Journal of American History, 77(3), 1113.

https://ensemble.temple.edu/hapi/v1/contents/permalinks/f8WFj62B/view

MacCormick, N., & Weinberger, O. (2013). An institutional theory of law: new approaches to legal positivism (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.