Essay Example on America's Judge Marilyn Milian: A 41-Minute Courtroom Drama

It was published and broadcasted on 23 March 2020. It is a 41-minute long show with a courtroom setting and almost real-life cases solved. The show however has no attachments with the judicial framework of the country. There have been a couple of judges since the premiere of the first episode. The story is narrated by Jack Harell (1981-1993) and Curt Chaplin (1997-present) with country of origin as the United States of America. The episodes original network is Syndicated. Marilyn Milian became the judge on 12 March 2001 and plays out her role perfectly; the execution of her judgments is smart. That is one of the attributes that make the show outstanding and realistic.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The episodes introduction stands out, the first case involving plaintiffs (Daniel and Kathryn) who are newly-weds, and the defendant (Gary Mckeon) accused of missing to pick up the bride on time. The case is well-executed, and the sarcastic nature of judge Milian dramatizes the whole scenario. She pokes fun at the ignorant nature of the driver before letting them know that it was wrong that the driver was not serious with the job and shamed the name of the company. The second case is a defendant (), an uncle to the plaintiff, accused of reneging on a deal to pay on a car repair. The final case revolves around stolen funds, and the plaintiff (Michael Bell) sues the defendant (Veola Anderson) to refund an amount of $4903. The cases all require settlement of specific amounts to the plaintiffs and judge Milian rules in favor of the first two cases and dismiss the third case without prejudice. The show has done pretty well to merge comedy with serious case proceedings and allowed the plaintiff to express their will freely, as witnessed in all the episodes' cases.

Praise is put on the show since these are real-life cases that people around the world are faced with. It aims at giving insight into what people go through in their daily lives. However, the fact that the defendant is not allowed enough time or chance to explain his side of the story is the downside of this show. In the three cases observed, the judge is skeptical about listening to the defendant. Her attention is geared to listening to the plaintiff and asking the defendant closed questions. The actors here may not give their full potential as they are limited to only act in the sense of either accusing or being accused, note they have not committed the felonies. The director does well linking these factors together.

Each case involves different characters except for the judge, and this is well-executed such that they own up the roles and brilliantly execute the script. Judge Milian is a very good performer, a character built from the fact that she is a media personality, a lecturer, and a retired Florida Circuit Court Judge. These traits contribute to her personalizing the Judge character practically well.

In between the scenes, it is observed that the public outside the courtroom setting is involved. The reporter seeks out to find the thoughts of what the real world feels about the theme of the case, for instance after the second case the reporter asks the public individuals randomly, "...would you sue your uncle?" and the responses are a true representation of how people interact with the cases. Mixed reactions are always expected and could lead to a thoughtful debate regarding the same issue. The general performance of this film is quite impressive in nature ad an ingenious idea when it comes to the point of visual aspects, the courtroom setting, the due respect accorded to the court as should be in reality. The costumes by judge Milian are accurate and fit perfectly to those of a judge in real life. The set designs and architectural design are a perfect representation of any standard courtroom, and quite distinguishable.

Episode 294

It is also a 41-minute long set led by Judge Milian starts with the usual sarcastic opening comments. The episode premiered on 23 March 2020 under the reality court show genre. Judge Milian exhibits a straight forward approach and demands for answers to specific questions asked. The first case is about a defendant (Peterson Rodriguez) not paying the plaintiff (Lawrence McKay) for merchandise worth $1200, and both parties are immigrants. The views of the public are real and genuine, which provides a platform to reflect the real drawbacks of online purchasing and the exposure to fraud cases. This case epitomizes the risks of cyber spying that could lead to loss of personal information, loss of funds if online platforms such as e-bay fail to provide security to users of their platform.

The second case involves a car loan defaulted under the name of a partner whose name was used in acquiring the loan before they separated. The plaintiff (Monique Felton) sues the defendant (Jaquan Hymes) to pay $1000 defaulted payments of the car. The scene depicts the misguided trust issues that partners or couples befit their partners and the lawsuits that follow upon separation of the partners. The two episodes mostly rotate around the day-to-day challenges, be it family feuds, customer-client relationships, couples as well as institutions are manipulated to an individual's interests.

Most people may argue that The People's Court has already had their best days and that quality of the content is on a declining course over the 250 episodes. There are not many shows of the same genre that can sustain for that long. The detailed research of the kinds of cases solved has proved convenient and have had some kind of mind-bending cases.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the people's court film adaptation of real-life courtroom setting, that kick-started its broadcast on 14 September 1981; continues to offer a satisfying experience to the audiences catching our attention with the grandeur of this era. The cast, situations, emotions, and the final judgments are always the most amazing things to anticipate about this film. It is above most of the other courtroom shows, and very vivid, delightful, as well as perfectly cast production and it is an entertaining and educative experience.

References

"The People's Court (Television Program: 1981 - 1993)." The People's Court, Warner Bros. Domestic Television Distribution, 23 March 2020, www.peoplescourt.com.