Do Legislators Respond to Public Prevalence? Paper Example

Introduction

The article represents an enduring topic in studying how the democratic government responds to the prevalences of the public (Barberá et al.). The research article follows the guidelines of two lines of inquiry constituting if legislators react to the matter precedence of the community and how they replicate the rule predilection that the populace posses on the issue.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Key debates:

Several debates surround the concept of measurement of concentration and schedule scenery by lawmakers and crowd community applying statistics. First, a major debate on this topic revolves around politicians' responsiveness to public priorities, which represent an empirical study that establishes the political responsiveness in America.

Second, the other debate applied in the topic entails means of subject receptiveness, which examines social media use by legislators and the masses as a measure of personal and precedence (Barberá et al.). Lastly, the article also has a major debate on mechanisms of issue responsiveness and computing concentration to an opinionated subject with subject representation that characterizes diverse matters that affiliates of public, legislators and information companies' houses discuss.

Part 2; Annotated Bibliography

Achilov, Dilshod, and Sedat Sen. "Got political Islam? Are politically moderate Muslims different from radicals?." International Political Science Review 38.5 (2017): 608-624. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0192512116641940

This article makes an explicit distinction between politically devout Muslims and the empirical validity of political radicles. The editorial examines the individuality of politically fundamental Muslim faith. The research article would help in establishing the link between politics and different religious understandings.

Alexandrova, Petya, Anne Rasmussen, and Dimiter Toshkov. "Agenda responsiveness in the European Council: Public priorities, policy problems, and political attention." West European Politics 39.4 (2016): 605-627. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2015.1104995

This article handles the concept of the existence of multilevel systems. The study establishes if such systems respond to the changing strategy precedence of their people. More significantly, the researches establish diachronic and synchronic among the populace and political problems that require attention.

Barberá, Pablo, et al. "Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and schedule set by legislators and the mass public using social media data." American Political Science Review 113.4 (2019): 883-901. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/who-leads-who-follows-measuring-issue-attention-and-agenda-setting-by-legislators-and-the-mass-public-using-social-media-data/D855849CE288A241529E9EC2E4FBD3A8

This research responds to the question of how responsive the legislators are to the challenges of society. The study displays a tough relationship between what the public cares about and the issues addressed by the legislature. The study remains beneficial in the study of the topic since it helps establish the relationship between legislators and subjects.

Hong, Sounman, and Sun Hyoung Kim. "Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments." Government Information Quarterly 33.4 (2016): 777-782. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X16300375

This article constitutes a study on an examination of two competing opinions on the use of advanced technology, especially Twitter, in politics. The study exploits variations among the member of the American congress and remains a significant area of research since the concept establishes social media polarization has a great impact on politics.

Works Cited

Achilov, Dilshod, and Sedat Sen. "Got political Islam? Are politically moderate Muslims different from radicals?." International Political Science Review 38.5 (2017): 608-624. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0192512116641940

Alexandrova, Petya, Anne Rasmussen, and Dimiter Toshkov. "Agenda responsiveness in the European Council: Public priorities, policy problems and political attention." West European Politics 39.4 (2016): 605-627. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01402382.2015.1104995

Barberá, Pablo, et al. "Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and schedule set by legislators and the mass public using social media data." American Political Science Review 113.4 (2019): 883-901. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/who-leads-who-follows-measuring-issue-attention-and-agenda-setting-by-legislators-and-the-mass-public-using-social-media-data/D855849CE288A241529E9EC2E4FBD3A8

Hong, Sounman, and Sun Hyoung Kim. "Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments." Government Information Quarterly 33.4 (2016): 777-782. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X16300375