Destructive Communication Essay

Introduction

Communication is an action of transmitting the intended information from one group, person, and an entity to another by the application of mutually understood language, signs and semiotic rules (Connolly, 2002). When there are factors that prevent or damage communication and distort meaning of the information or prevent the information from being shared in a proper manner, the way it is intended to be, it becomes the destructed communication. This paper explores on some of the forms that the destructive communication takes.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

One-Upping

One-upping is the act of viewing every small piece of communication talk as an opportunity of the supreme conversational dominance over the other person, group or entity (Markman, 2012). One-upping is itself a habit that destructs the communication and sometimes can lead to the breaking up of friendship due to the improper communication. The one-upping can be exemplified by a friend who when being describing to how the new machine is good; he said his device is best, telling how the one he has is sophisticated and user-friendly than any other that has ever been in the world. The other time when he was being told of the how it feels to suffer from flu, he dominates by describing how he almost died from a rare disease that has not been recorded even in the medical journals, and they seem to name the condition after him. The one-upping habit annoys the audience and distorts the relationship between the people. The assumption of the friend was the reaction.

Withdrawing

Withdrawing communication is a behavior involves one group or person puts more pressure, blames and demands to the other group or person while the other one avoids or withdraws from that communication hence destructing the communication. The communication withdrawing can also be in the form of one particular group or an individual make an effort to discuss a problem but the other group or individual end the discussion or avoid the issue, by walking away or changing the topic.

The withdrawal has been witnessed as couples were to discuss on how the drug abuse can affect the future of the individual and the society at large, but the other avoiding the discussion, claiming that it is a discussion for another day. The withdrawing has tainted the relationship between the people the two groups that are involved and makes the person avoided not to feel free in another discussion.

Bottling Negative Emotions

Bottling negative emotion is the act of concealing the feeling of the unhappy or unpleasant emotion concerning an individual or a group of people, or even an event. The bottling of negative emotion acts a destructive to the communication. This can be exemplified by the supervisor who one day come and seems to be very angry with every worker. The bottling of the negative emotions makes someone to say what is mean to another person who is not involved in the provocation of the emotion, as people try to communicate.

Lashing Out Unexpectedly

The act of lashing out unexpectedly is the whereby someone suddenly attacks the other person or a group of people; this attack can be in the form of criticisms or physical in an angry manner in a way that the party attacked was not expecting to happen. This has been observed in a child who when he becomes angry screams and throwing the objects that are dangerous, hitting every object and bites anyone who is around him. This behavior of lashing out unexpectedly do destruct the communication because the person lashing out cannot communicate so that he/she may convey the meaningful message of what he/she wants to address. This makes others to shun the persons present hence the person will not easily find an audience to air out his/her grievances to at the time of distress.

Engaging in Personal Insult Rather Than Addressing a Problem

The Personal insult is participating in a negative remark about a group of people or an individual; it is usually done in demeaning tones which are considered to be harmful words(Storlie, 2015). The personal insults are mainly directed at an individual's traits, personality or character. Theinvolvement of the personal insult instead of the addressing the problem is one of the effects of in the personal insult instead of addressing the problem, the person is likely to cause communication destructor. This has been witnessed when the politicians engage themselves in the insulting each other during the campaign instead of addressing the society at large. This creates the barrier, and a rift between the two and the two window of communication is destructed as one will view the other with utter contempt.

Insistence on Handling Issues Alone

The insistence in the handling of issues alone comes as a result of a person or a group demanding to solve the problem by themselves (Storlie, 2015). This, therefore, denies the other people or a group who are in partnership with the person a chance to communicate in getting the solution to the existing problem. This is one form of the communication destructor. This is witnessed in between the couples as the husband insists on handling all the issues concerning the children discipline alone. This makes the other partner wife to ignore most things without communicating to the husband and the communication in the matters of the children characters being destructed.

References

Connolly, J. (2002). Accommodating Natural Language Within The Organisational Semiotic Framework. Information and Organization Design Series 6(46), 3-21.

Markman, K. M. (2012). 22. Conversational coherence in small group chat. Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(46):23-26.

Storlie, T. A. (2015). Person-Centered Communication. Person-Centered Communication with Older Adults,23(9) 87-107.