Introduction
Cybercrime has become a significant concern with the increase of technology and innovation advancement as a result of increased internet accessibility and connectivity. In most cases, cybercrime involves an attempt to gain access to Organizational and personal data that are essential since it comprises of private and organizational intellectual properties. The purpose of the paper is to discuss the statement made by Schneier that autonomy, automation, and the physical agency will automatically make computer security a matter of life and death.
I agree with Bruce Schneier's statement on issues relating to computer security by terming cybersecurity as a matter of life and death as a result of influence and impacts autonomy, automation, and physical agency. Internet is everywhere since people walk and travel with it through personal computers, telephones, streetlights, vacuum cleaners, the list is endless since people interact and utilize a different kind of tools to communicate, and do business operations (Schneier,2019, n. p). Therefore, the internet has taken control over and control most of the activities in the modern world.
With increased technological and innovation advancement, most business organization and business personnel have digitalized their business operations, of which most of the intellectual properties and financial transactions are done online. At the same time, cybercrime criminal is advancing their strategical plans to access private and confidential information putting big data stored by the companies at much risk. The theft of big data jeopardizes the business operation of the victims through the loss of their proper intellectual information that acts as competitive strategies. Insurance and financial organization lose their long term clients when the essential and private information such as financial statements and cash flow are exposed and accessed by cybercriminals (Smith,2020, n.p). People feel safe with organizations that had never experienced and faced challenges associated with cybercrimes as a result of better and adequate security measures an organization had established to reinforce cybercrime security.
Cybercrime affects not only business operations but also the political system. Bots are destroying international and national by manipulating political discourse by changing the rights and decisions of the citizens. Computer piracy is the mouthpiece for foreign-affiliated actors and the domestic political system and group, and the political candidate themselves (Severance,2016, pp.7-8). During the presidential campaign season in most developing and developed nations, the candidate uses computer technology and innovation to manipulate citizens through use propaganda. Based on this, it indicates that we must confront cybercrime by address issues related to personal agency, auto Mancy and computer automation, as suggested by Bruce Schneier since not only affect the person but a whole society.
Besides, the artificial personas are being created, and soon than the community expects, they are poised to take over political debate and decisions. Schneier argues that computer security threat will arise from different cybersecurity coming together from social media chatbots and artificial intelligence generated text, and there is the possibility of computer-generated "individual" outstand actual human-driven discussion on the internet. It will have a significant impact on society. It creates the need for addressing and combating channels to enables cybercrime persons to carry out their criminal activities.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Bruce Schneier was right by arguing that physical agency, autonomy, automation, and will automatically make computer technology and innovation security will affect data storage security but will be a matter of life and death. It essential for every business organization and individual to establish a sustainable cybersecurity mechanism and work collaboratively to address computer security issues.
Reference List
Schneier, B. (2019). Schneier on security: privacy and control. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 2(1). https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/download/579/562
Severance, C., 2016. Bruce Schneier: the security mindset. Computer, 49(2), pp.7-8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7404197/
Smith, S.S., 2020. Cybersecurity & Insurance. In Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services (pp. 193-200). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-29761-9_15
Cite this page
Cybercrime: Autonomy, Automation & Physical Agency - Essay Sample. (2023, May 06). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/cybercrime-autonomy-automation-physical-agency-essay-sample
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Critical Thinking on Battered Woman Syndrome
- Paper Example on John Locke's Theory of Natural Rights
- Essay Sample on Obama Care: Improving Lives of Millions in Texas
- Essay Example on ANA's Stance on Marijuana Use in Healthcare
- Fremont Jail & CA State Prison: Bail, Visiting & Inmate Info - Essay Sample
- Essay Sample on Newdow v. Elk Grove: An Establishment Clause Test Case
- Essay Example on Dream/Killer: True Story of Wrongful Conviction in 2015 Documentary