Critique on Unipolarity and Multipolarity Essay

Over the years, there has been a great concern that is rising over the supremacy of countries across the globe. Most of the countries have always strived to be the best in the different fields of technology development, industrialization and other forms of state development. This has led to the calling of advancements in different areas through proper training and adequate research. Through these consistent research over the years, the creation of better living has been obtained through technological improvements (Waever, 2018). The issue of supremacy among the different countries has, however, led to the concealing of information that is based on the different occurrence of developments. While one country may be focused on developing its infrastructure to ensure a greater aspect of advanced technology has been achieved another is developing its weaponry over fears that another country may outdo their prowess in another field.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This aspect has harbored uniform development as a universe due to the different aspects of personal improvements and success as a country. This has led to the adoption of unipolarity among the countries of the world. The thirst for power has however been the greatest contributor towards personal improvement as a country. Though unipolarity has led to the increased the issue of deterrence in the international realm, it is still seen to be adopted as the years go by. Though there are great advantages of ensuring only countries in a region benefits from the different advancements in the different fields, there is a great importance in ensuring some of the advantages of adopting multipolarity (Waltz, 2016). There are great advantages behind implementing both aspects to ensure that the different countries are advantaged with the sharing of information about the developments in the countries.

The creation of an equal platform for the development of the countries will be of great importance due to the diverse knowledge spread across the world. Some of the countries that are not yet fully developed may use this opportunity to develop themselves and become better. The adoption of multipolarity in the world is seen to guarantee free movement of the people across the world (Schmitt, 2016). While this may seem like a good idea, there it is important that the different organizations may come together to ensure that the implementation process is properly reviewed. Through the creation of a body that oversees the loopholes in the implementation process will ensure people are well-defined laws. These laws will be used as the guiding forces to ensure people are well managed and crime is reduced.

Conclusion

The implementation of multipolarity across the world is a great move to unify the world with the different aspect of development being one of the greatest objectives among the countries. Through the adequate inclusion of different quality brains across the world will transform the world into a better place. Though this may seem next to impossible, the placement of a body that will ensure biases is not seen will be very important (Chomsky, 2015). The issue of equality for all will greatly help to ensure the countries benefit equally from the resources that are utilized. Through the use of the resources better living conditions are aimed to be achieved. There is an aspect of time of transition that may arise during the process, this means the process may take a while. A proper implementation should also include all the stakeholders to ensure the transformation process is a success in all the countries.

References

Chomsky, N. (2015). On power and ideology: The Managua lectures. Haymarket Books.

Schmitt, C., Schmitt, C., Schmitt, C., Schmitt, C., Schmitt, C., Schmitt, C., ... & Schmitt, C. (2016). Carl Schmitt in China. In On Schmitt and Space (Vol. 72, No. 1955, pp. 1-9). London: Routledge.

Waever, O. (2018). A Post-Western Europe: Strange Identities in a Less Liberal World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 75-88.

Waltz, K. (2016). A Systemic Theory of the Alliance Market. The Supply Side of Security: A Market Theory of Military Alliances, 45, 49.