From Brent Knutson in addressing the issue of whether national speed limits necessary and whether they are supposed to be there in the United States, there exist some important values, assumptions, and beliefs that are driving the argument. One important belief is that the from the United States interstate highways based on his experience while driving in German autobahns, the speed limit are considered to be important and necessary at the same point.
Moving on to the ideas and content, Knutson attempt to apply good ideas, bringing out a solid reasoning in offering support to when it comes to the general speed limit in the United States demonstrating that interstate highway is supposed to be replaced. It ascertains that not only speed limit on the United States unnecessarily restrictive, but they are also guided on unnecessary denial of freedom on the American citizens. Even though there exist various locations where the speed limit is perceived to be appropriate and convenient at the same time, in most cases some of these limits are arbitrarily sporadically and imposed. The main benefit is that modern automobile has a great chance of traveling safely at a great speed despite what the auto insurance companies would have us believe that speed does not kill.
According to the article, those who are opposed to the lifting the national speed limit, raise the argument that removing such restriction would to some level cause resistance in mayhem on the freeways; they are operating with the conviction their countryside would be polluted and at the same time littered with carcasses of individuals who would have achieved terminal velocity only to move away from the road and actually explode into flames. From what is perceived by speed limits advocates in America, it is important to note that their argument has always been that American drivers are not competent enough and they do not possess the skills and the capacity of driving at autobahn speeds. One of the main facts that are supporting this is that the American driver's education programs are not efficient enough to prepare drivers to manage the operation of vehicles and that obtaining driver's license in the United States is identified to be very easy hence lifting the speed limit will be very irresponsible.
Throughout the article, there was quite an efficiency, a general objectivity to Knutson's tone on auto liberation. He avoided incorporating the use of the first person narrative and concentrating in bringing out his beliefs, facts about German systems and deductions from the data, using good words and the best phrases in the process. In the process, he demonstrated that some of the individuals who are opposed to the lift of the national speed limit are interestingly on the argument that removing some of the restrictions would create serious challenges, with widespread carnage that will take place just because of fear. However, the belief that no speed limit will end up causing carnage appears to be operating in fear. Basically, the contention that American drivers are not in the position of driving safely at a greater speed is a good evidence that speeding is not a good idea for American highways. With what is currently experienced in American highway, high speed is dangerous and has a great impact on the end result of the general operations. When one is driving around the American cities, they are bound to be a witness of several displays of carelessness and some are based on incompetence and low skills in the process. Since American driving program to some level is perceived to be poor, what is happening in most American highways make them stand out as one of the worst drivers globally.
As for methodology, good driving skills is very important for America and unless this skill is instilled on highways and on the drivers, then carelessness and accidents will be odd of the day in their highways' from international aspects and what is currently happening in Germany, competency and good highway management is the only requisite in managing speed in most highways. Based on the experience in Germany, one major lesson is that the pleasure of high speed is based on good monitoring on how things are supposed to be happening efficiently. A good impression in highways is always brought by discipline and the skills demonstrated by the virtually all the drivers that are traveling on the network of a superhighway that is bringing up a combine make up of the autobahn system. Comparatively, Germany has been so successful since they have developed one of the best cultures with very efficient automobile laws serving as the best example that should be followed by other regions such as the United States. In Germany, highways over there are operating with the idea of such accuracy and good management, whereas the United States highway is not as efficient to the same level as that one for Germany. Here the scale between the two highway operations' tend to vary, hence the performance on the same graph does not reflect an accurate reading.
In terms of structuring the article, Knutson opens the article by discussing the broad nature and status of the united state's highway and the reason as to why it cannot support high speed at the same time, the details on how the German highway is being operated and managed at the same time. The article presents a logical progression up to where the highway matters are discussed in Germany and other parts of the world, and then abruptly returns to the specifics of highway operation in Germany and how the operation is supposed to be managed through ensuring changes is done in the United States highway operation and the general training of their drivers. These late introductions where the article is wrapped sound as the last minute thought, far from the smooth progression earlier in the article.
The article is well researched and straightforward. The flow of ideas progressed very smoothly up until the point the author decides to include important matters at the end such as the adoption of legislation systems and insurance that is involved in the whole process. It is not reasonable to introduce new ideas without further elaborating the reason as to why they were introduced in the first place. Moreover, some of the author's arguments were convincing, while others need to be re-assessed in order to have a deeper impact on the reader. Even though there exist various locations where the speed limit is perceived to be appropriate and convenient at the same time, in most cases some of these limits are arbitrarily sporadically and imposed. The main benefit is that modern automobile has a great chance of traveling safely at a great speed despite what the auto insurance companies would have us believe that speed does not kill.
Cite this page
Critical Evaluation of Auto Liberation by Knutson Article. (2022, Nov 06). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/critical-evaluation-of-auto-liberation-by-knutson-article
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Essay Example on Management - Leadership Styles
- Exploring Kohl and Hofstede Values Based on the Apple Company Essay
- Research Paper on Nalfon Drug
- Effective and Practical Methods of Providing Antimicrobial Therapy Article Review Paper Example
- Essay Sample on Mars Colonization
- Research Paper on Hulu Company
- New Insights Gained Based on My Results of the Emotional Intelligence Assessment - Research Paper