California Laws Essay Example

In 2018, the California Chamber of Commerce released laws that were scheduled to be implemented within the shortest time possible. One proposal that citizens in California demanded was the parental leave. The New Parent Leave act also known as the Senate Bill 63 addressed the issue concerning unpaid parental leave for twelve weeks (Roosevelt, 2017). The consent which was for bonding with the children was only meant for parents that either adopted or gave birth to a child within one year because the first few months after the baby was born was vital for the emotional and cognitive development of the children. Signed by David brown under the name SB 63, the governor found that it was important for the new parents to spend time with their children (Roosevelt, 2017). The law, however, had a few challenges concerning the type of business and the living status of the parents including the location of the town. While California added new regulations, the essay will argue that the New Parent Leave will be beneficial.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This law will work because most employers that own large businesses have the right offer job-protected leave under the federal law. The primary reason is that California always wanted to create time for parents and their babies to bond only under the agreement of the employers. The author of the Senate Bill 63 Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson also stated that "working parents should decide whether they want to keep their jobs or care for their newborns," (Roosevelt, 2017). Under the law, over 2.7 million California father and mothers are said to gain the extended 12 weeks protected leaves to take care of their newborn babies.

The new parental leave will also work California is known as a state of families and not about the Silicon Valley, Hollywood and agriculture (Roosevelt, 2017). While Governor Brown was signing the new Parental law while being surrounded by the women legislators, he said that "California is all about kids and families; he also added that the state is showing the way for families, women, husbands and kids," (Roosevelt, 2017).

While there were a few oppositions concerning the law regarding businesses, especially those that had less than 20 employees, Brown also looked at that factor by amending the bill under the pilot mediation program particularly the California Department of Fair housing and employment (Roosevelt, 2017). This gives another reason why the law will benefit California because the employer had the right to request for mediation so that the employee does not sue the company due to unsecure-parental leave. Governor Brown was aware that not all California citizens had a better living standard and that's why he considers them by emending the bill.

Lastly, the law will work because the amendment also met the needs of workers who lived from paycheck to paycheck particularly in San Francisco by allowing them to acquire a six week fully paid and job-protected leave for both fathers and mothers who worked in companies that had less than 20 workers (Roosevelt, 2017). Not only did the amended law guarantee these parents the right to bond with their newborn but also assured them their jobs back. This refused the confusion that would arise where parents would either reject the leaves because of the fear of not going back or reject the leave because of lack of pay.

References

Roosevelt, M. (2017, October 13). Parental leave expands for California workers so they can bond with their newborns. Retrieved from https://www.ocregister.com/2017/10/12/parental-leave-expands-for-california-workers-so-they-can-bond-with-their-newborns/