Assignment Example Plural Executive vs. Single Executive

The plural executive is more democratic than the single executive since unlike in the later, power in the plural executive is not vested in a single individual. The plural executive is composed of seven members, six of whom are elected on partisan elections. Each member of the plural executive can choose to work independently since they fight to be accountable to the public. Furthermore, the accountability aspects make them work in favor of the public leaving their agendas aside in most case. Unlike in singular executive where the man who has the powers is answerable to nobody, plural executive calls for impeachment of any member because of gross misconduct.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Powers are subdivided into the different members of the executive making it hard for misconduct since no single member has total power. This calls for the members t work together to make an impact in their office term. Governor has to be persuasive to win other the interests of the other members and ensure that his policies are a success during his term in office. Single executive in most cases results into tyrannical kind of leadership which is not conducive for the proper discharge of services to the governed.

Texas is one of the states in the US that empress plural executive leading to circumscribing of the governor's powers. The governor enjoys good pay, and he is wealthy, but when it comes to power the case turns the other way. "The plural executive limits the power of executive officials and makes these officers more accountable to the public, but it can be inefficient at times" (Champagne & Edward 2013 chapter 8). Power and authority get divided to the different members elected in the plural executive calling for the corporation of all members for the prosperity of service discharging in Texas. Unlike in the other states, Texas governor has to share the powers and authority in the leadership with the different members of the plural executive.

Consequently, there is a post of lieutenant governor outside the office of governor meaning that the governor of Texas does not have the final say in the leadership hierarchy. The dispersal of power in Texas allows different groups that are interested in the governance of Texas to get the opportunity of influencing the government and policy-making in this state (Champagne & Edward 2013).

The plural executive is a model of governance whereby the leading powers and authorities are not vested in a single individual (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary). It consists of several members who have to work together for success in service discharge. This has been used exclusively in Texas government.

Single executive, on the other hand, is a model whereby all leadership powers and authority are vested in a single individual (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary). It is this only leader who makes the decision, and in most case, they are tyrannical leaders with their say being final and followed without compromise.

What are the arguments for and against a plural executive?

Cons

In plural executive, a different member of the executive might have a personal interest, and this may cause competition. Mischievous deeds like bribing them to come in terms with the others might erupt. Competition resulting from personal interests is set to prevent effective and smooth discharge of services to the governed (Champagne & Edward 2013).

Governor's control over the executive is limited since he or she is a member of the plural executive like any other member. The fact that the individual members make decisions at their interest will result in the limitation of service discharge. Additionally, the governor does not have the mandate to oversee the committee.

The presence of different members who sit in the plural executive brings about accountability hence discharge of service to the governed is assured (Champagne & Edward 2013). Evil vices in the community are practically impossible considering a large number of members, board staff, and commissioner in charge of different departments. Furthermore, no one has the total power or authority hence the inclusion of all is not in question.

Circumscription of the governor's power brings about accountability and the spread of power which enhances government efficiency in delivering services to the governed. Subdivision of power to different members of the executive ensures increased accountability in the government. Lieutenant governor Presence in the hierarchy of governance ensures that the governor is put into the task of ensuring his government delivers its mandate to the people (Champagne & Edward 2013). Also, the dispersal of the powers to different people allows the interested groups in the leadership of the state to have the opportunities of influencing government and policy-making process.

Remain the same. The people elect each official so the executive office is more representative of the population than a single executive office would be. It also allows for accountability and efficiency in the government of the day.

References

Champagne, Anthony, and Edward J. Harpham. Governing Texas: An Introduction to Texas Politics Second Edition. Norton, 2013.

Merriam Webmaster. Defination of word: Plural Executive and Single Executive. n.d. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary