Arguments in Favor of Objectivism and Subjectivism Essay

Introduction

Over time, many anthropologists and sociologists have had divergent views about societal moral issues which, in one way or another have contributed to the high ethical discourse and standards. In his article, "Why I Am an Objectivist about Ethics," David Enoch points out that morality, as based on objectivity often becomes irresistible to most people. However, Enoch argues that some thoughts may appear irresistible only at the beginning of a discussion. As such, the thoughts may eventually call for a review of one's beliefs in order to get the starting point right. In this argumentative paper, therefore, we seek to present an argument in favor of objectivism, subjectivism as well as cultural relativism as found in the article "Why I Am an Objectivist about Ethics."

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Arguments in Favor of Objectivism

In as much people may find it irresistible to agree on moral realism, still, the mere fact of a disagreement in regard to an issue under discussion shows that there is absolutely no objectivism. Take for instance a case where there are political disagreements between individuals who are divided along party lines. In such a political duel, it is likely that there exist independent opinions and beliefs in regard to party manifestos which may often change in the manner in which people perceive their stands. Therefore, while seeking to air each other views, the two parties are bound in engage in a counterfactual discussion where they will present their objective facts as consistent with other facts.

According to Enoch (2014), several disagreement objections which provides that the presence and character of moral judgment are morally not objective begs the question against the objectivist. Such a notion tends to underrate the extent of disagreement in subject matters that are rather uncontroversial. For instance, in criminal cases where an individual is charged with failing to appear before a court and answer charges in regard to the death of another person, the aspect of disagreement in subject matters is bound to arise on the pretext of non-compliance with court orders. However, one may fail to distinguish between objectivity, thereby undermining the non-objectivism of the matter under discussion.

In defense of objectivism about moral obligation, Enoch enumerates a number of empirical methodologies which puts morality as a subject matter (David Enoch, 2014). For example, when people become worried and intolerant about the rules and regulations governing them, they are most likely to become objective about morality. As such, it will imply that the aspect of intolerance will be morally permissible to them thereby creating a state of objectivism in the society. More so, people are always susceptible to the moral standards in the society particularly when faced with a challenge that calls for their personal attention. Enoch points out some phenomenological tests such as the counterfactual test to test the empirical deliberation that persons may use in the day to day life.

However, the society today requires individuals to adapt behavioral and positive thinking ethics in the approach of issues. The required ethical morals are important in the proper interaction among the people such that humility and a good relationship can be enhanced. Additionally, the aspect of incorporating dialogue in the discussions aims at creating a resolution in a conflict. In regard to what Enoch proposes in the society, objectivism should always be viewed as to imply good morals are essential for a growing society. In conclusion, therefore, the aspect of objectivism is important when discussing the moral perception of individuals in a society.

Reference

David Enoch. (2014). Why I am an Objectivist about Ethics (And Why You Are, Too): Ethical Life . The Oxford Univerty Press. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/ENOWIA