Annotated Bibliography on Understanding Human Nature: A Guide to Effective Workplace Relations

Clydesdale, G. (2013). Human Nature. A Guide to Managing Workplace Relations. ProQuest Ebook Central. Routledge

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This is a book from Gower publishing written by Greg Clydesdale from Lincoln University in New Zealand. The claim of the book is that good management is a product of understanding human nature and interpersonal relations. In support of the claim, the author fails to use the most common conceptual techniques used to assess various points. Therefore, Clydesdale avoids taking a weak turn that only takes workplace dating in terms of social ability. Some areas of the book prove how managers fail to make balancing acts between conflicting forces due to workplace romance. Some of the areas looked into within the piece include emotion, motivation, and cognition as human characteristics and their relation with workplace dating. For instance, workplace dating makes managers emotionally drained, letting their minds be diverted from their work. Some other times, it is the managers that have to deal with bad relationships, which consume their time and lead to more issues such as stress that greatly affect work performance.

Clydesdale's book sufficiently recognizes the impacts of workplace dating by considering the human characteristics in terms of emotion, motivation, and cognition. Most of the information from the book is current, as most managers have to deal with dating-related matters before attending to their duties. As a result, the different negative impacts, such as poor relations, time wastage, and stress, arise. Information from the book is credible as Clydesdale has various widely published academic journals. The author intensely focuses on human nature and the related theoretical understanding. Combining the two is what leads to important information on what happens in the workplace as a result of dating. The various limitations existing with the information is that some of the data has not been referenced and may fail to qualify for credibility. However, most of the data is common knowledge that is useful for research.

Green, A. (2018). All Your Questions About Dating a Co-worker, Answered. Retrieved from https://www.thecut.com/article/ask-a-boss-workplace-romance.html

This is an electronic source from The Cut Magazine that focuses on the answers to questions relating to dating a co-worker. The author, Alison Green, tackles various questions that relate to office relationships and workplace dating. The main claim of the piece is to prove how difficult it is to balance office dating with workplace duties. For instance, the question presented regarding whether one should be open for having a crush on a co-worker is negatively countered for the reasons of professionalism. Even so, she remains lenient at some of the questions such as that which queries on having an outside partner in company matters such as organizational dinner. Almost every question on workplace relationships is settled by Alison and is not only valuable to the inquisitive, but also to the audience and reader of the article.

The article is a credible source having been published with The Cut Magazine, which is among the well renowned New Zealand masterpieces. Besides, the primary author, Alison Green, is considered a columnist and the "Ask a Boss" for the organization. The information presented in the piece is current as it presents the most challenging questions that workers have to go through before they can make succinct decisions in the workplace. Green also gives the latest articles even from the 20th of January, 2020, that seek to answer questions with an attitude among workers, especially since it is a product of workplace relationships. Some of the limitations with the piece include the lack of sufficient background for the answers. Even though most of the answers are given based on professionalism, some backing information is missing. However, Green gives an outline of the various issues that are presented with dating in the workplace.

Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2009). When work and love mix: Perceptions of peers in workplace romances. Western Journal of Communication, 73(4), 349-369. doi: 10.1080/10570310903279042.

This is a credible scholarly article that focuses on workplace romances and their effects on scholars. The aim of the study was to look into the interpersonal consideration of peers who involve themselves with workplace dating. The researchers also intended to seek the organization and communicative responses involved among the peers. The article borrows its information from already existing credible sources. 47% of employees that has been used as a lead to workplace romance were sourced from a credible source by Shellenbarger. The researchers used status differential to come to an effective conclusion of the negative perceptions of romances. Besides, the status dynamics of workplace dating, such as trust, solidarity, and information manipulation, were used to support the claim that scholars were affected by workplace dating. All research led to the conclusion that employees trusted peers less, felt less solidarity, communicated deception, and were less honest with each other as soon as they were involved with workplace dating.

This scholarly article sufficiently looks into its thesis by looking at the most important links between dating and communication. A focus on trust, solidarity, and information manipulation throughout the research hypotheses were critical to ensuring that the research remained on topic. The information from the source is related to the current phenomenon and occurrences in the workplace, considering the workplace intercultural factor that affects communication among peers in the work environment. The research is credible as the information has been sought by Horan, a professor from West Virginia University in 2009, and Chory, a professor from Michigan State University in 2000. Besides, the article has been approved by the International Communication Association. The limitations with the article include borrowed hypothetical cases, the inability to assess potential moderators, the focus on heterosexuality, and the use of student recruiters, which was a manipulative tactic. Even so, the article answers the issues that exist with organization and communication as it relates to workplace dating.

Malachowski, C. C., Chory, R. M., & Claus, C. J. (2012). Mixing pleasure with work: Employee perceptions of and responses to workplace romance. Western Journal of communication, 76(4), 358-379. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2012.656215.

This is a scholarly article that focuses on the responses from third parties regarding workplace romance. The researchers intended to make different claims from the same research pointing to a single focus. The thesis was aimed at examining overlapping occasions between public and private spheres as it relates to workplace romance motives, unfair advantages, trust, and information manipulation. The evidence purported for the article involves members' perceptions of workplace dating and the different communicative responses made for the various co-workers. Besides, the researchers found that the different perceptions of peers about workplace romance were not different withstanding the sexes of the peers or workplace dating partner status. The article also gives distinct sources of workplace dating, which lead to issues among the workers. Some of the factors considered included job motives, love motives, and unfair advantage.

The source sufficiently supports the purpose of the research as it looks into the various intermediaries that exist with workplace dating and overlapping occasions. Besides, all seven hypotheses and five research questions lead to the same focus - workplace romance and its consequences to the workers. Besides, the participants used were selected from diverse demographic characteristics to maximize the research answer. Information was also borrowed from credible sources, including research by Horan and Chory. The information from the piece is current, as workplace dating is similarly perceived, even considering different sources of data from the public. The piece is also credible as it meets the criteria for a peer-reviewed article. Malachowski is a professor from West Virginia University in 2012; Chory is a professor from Michigan State University in 2000, while Claus is a master's associate from the University of the Pacific in 2007. The limitations with the study include the use of scenarios instead of real perceptions, the failure to acknowledge how daters manage their relationships, and a focus on heterosexuality. Information from the article is suitable for my research question as it presents the most critical issues that exist with workplace romance that comprise negative evaluative, relational, and communicative measures.

Mintz, S. (2018). Dating in the Workplace. Retrieved from https://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/2018/11/dating-in-the-workplace.html

This is an electronic source from the Workplace Ethics Advice website that focuses on matters relating to dating in the workplace only. Steven Mintz, the author of the article, places his focus on the existing conflict of interest that exists with workplace relationships. Hierarchical dating, as is referred, is prohibited by the article with various supporting evidence. Objectivity and independence are altered by hierarchical dating, which leads to negative job performance. Besides, both sides of independence, which include independence in appearance and independence, in fact, are altered. Besides, favor is perceived in the workplace in ways such as bonuses, monetary resources, and promotions, which prove unfair advantage among the workers. These consequentially lead to the loss of trust between seniors and subordinates as professionalism is destroyed.

The piece sufficiently gives backup claims on matters regarding dating in the workplace and looks into the different types of romance and their relations with job performance. For instance, some factors such as long lunches, extended discussions, late arrivals, and missed meetings are given as proof of the consequences of workplace dating. The information is credible as the author is a professional in the field of workplace ethics. The piece points to its focus on multiple disciplines, including integrity, organization culture, corporate social responsibility, loyalty, and conflict of interest. Besides, the author credits external information from other authors such as Wilson. The only limitations with the article include the lack of information from other areas, including ethics. The information is valuable, yet too little for research on organization ethics and workplace relationships. Even so, every word included in the piece is valuable for my research as the issues presented sufficiently answer the research question.

References

Clydesdale, G. (2013). Human Nature. A Guide to Managing Workplace Relations. ProQuest Ebook Central. RoutledgeGreen, A. (2018). All Your Questions About Dating a Co-worker, Answered. Retrieved from https://www.thecut.com/article/ask-a-boss-workplace-romance.html

Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2009). When work and love mix: Perceptions of peers in workplace romances. Western Journal of Communication, 73(4), 349-369. doi: 10.1080/10570310903279042.

Malachowski, C. C., Chory, R. M., & Claus, C. J. (2012). Mixing pleasure with work: Employee perceptions of and responses to workplace romance. Western Journal of communication, 76(4), 358-379. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2012.656215.

Mintz, S. (2018). Dating in the Workplace. Retrieved from https://www.workplaceethicsadvice.com/2018/11/dating-in-the-workplace.html