2015 Nuclear Accord Paper Example

Section I: Topic Introduction

The signing of the 2015 nuclear accord involved the United States, Europe, and other countries with the purpose to control Iran's nuclear missiles, which lifted the economic sanctions previously imposed on Iran. Recently the new administration of the US imposed the sanctions again after President Trump stated that Iran was behaving in a threatening and destabilizing manner by continuing the nuclear program and weaponry. Trump decided to pull out of the 2015 agreement that was signed, and this decision to pull out has put pressure on Iran to force them to abide by US demands. These US sanctions imposed on Iran is targeting Iran's economy, and it is inhabiting the relations between the two countries. Consequently, Iran's trade with other countries is affected and has caused to monetary loss among many industries in Iran that were significant contributors to the economy.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

This topic needs more concern and attention because the imposed the sanctions will have negative impacts on Iran's growing economy as the relationship between Iran and the US hangs in the balance. The recent developments that have ascended have made many analyze and wonder where this will end and what will be the outcome. The recent event does not only pose a threat to Iran's economy but also to the relations between the countries involved in signing the 2015 agreement. The conflict between the United States and Iran started because of one aspect that IR does not cover in detail; the need to dominate and control others to make their own countries fiercer sometimes theorized as neo-imperialism. The US has been trying to control Iran to control the development of their weaponry and to become independent and powerful based on their relationship with Iran. However, the US has taken recent steps to ensure that they pull out of the agreement leading to sanctions for the IR.

The issue between Iran and US began because the US wanted to control Iran's weaponry and stop them from improving their nuclear power. The United States has been observed to follow the capitalist idea, which focuses on giving the private sector dominance, and have more freedom than normally given. The US wanted to show their power and strength over Iran by placing inhabitation between their trades. The capitalist ideology of the US is in favor of the concept of free trade and is focused on private ownership for creating profit. The ideology has been observed in this issue as well because the sanctions have been placed on Iran to hinder its free trade and this deems to be a punishment for Iran. The scholars should research more on this subject to understand why countries take these steps and the purpose behind their decisions. It is important to be able to comprehend these intricacies and complex reasoning that influences these decisions.

The question that arises is: What does the United States hope to gain from pulling out of the deal and how will imposing sanctions on Iran help them in achieving their objective? The fact is that sanctions imposed on Iran's nuclear programs and industries will, without any doubt, have an immense impact on the country's economy. If the situation continues this way in the future, the relationship between both countries will become quite strained. The subject should be considered to research these topics and helps in the understanding of the complications and details of the events like the US-Iran issue that have occurred recently. The differences in the interests of the two countries have also become the reason behind the conflict; the US wants to control and demonstrate its power whereas Iran wants to become independent and powerful.

The research question is good because it involves an analysis of the factors that have resulted in a detrimental relationship between the two countries. It further shows the impact of the decision by the united states to withdraw the deal from Iran. It is an interesting topic that will allow the use of the scientific approach to determine the causal relationship of the matter under study and define its effects on the political, economic, and social aspects of the lives of the two countries.

Section II: Literature Review

There are quite several perspectives within the literature review that tends to answer my research question, and these perspectives will be discussed in the section below

School of thought 1: "the continuous conflict in ideas and demand between USA and Iran" ideological and comparative approaches. The specifics provided in the recent research clearly shows the relationships that exist between nations are much better as compared to the United States' relationship with Iran. Today, in history, when it comes either to the international terrorism, the nuclear proliferation or even the fossil fuel talk, the European Union or the Middle East peace talks it comes to pass that in their talk and discussion of the various global issues majorly affecting the international communities and world at large. The strained relationship between the United States and Iran is clearly not a point of interest for them. Due to these factors that arise, it becomes vital and important to come to a possible solution to improve the relationship between both countries.

The relationship between the United States and Iran came to a standstill in 1979 when the turmoil of the Islamic revolution occurred in Iran. Up to this moment, both countries have not been able to rebuild a proper relationship based on mutual understanding. As the United States and Iran's cold relations continue to develop, the United States had on several occasions sought further dependent more so to the Iranian government so that they beat a position to continue enjoying the communism within the Asian countries. While on the other hand, Iran used to enjoy a great portion of economic support and sometimes received very advanced support of the western technological structures to enable them to be at a position to enjoy the exploitation of their oil and wealth that resulted from the same. Now both the cultural, the military and at some time the economic and the political relationships were deep and enjoyed by both nations. However, it was through such a context that the relationship of the United States builds up and ultimately withered leading to a very harsh relationship after that. The research question of this study therefore is, will the United States and the Iranian relation lead to outstanding consequences between the two nations if an amicable solution is not realized in time?

The Iranian Perspective

The researches that have been conducted in most ideal point places shows that Iran tends to be a looming and a fiercely Anti-American nation. The main antagonist of Iran to the United States revolves around the central role mainly of their daily political system but mostly revolves also within the center of the social fabric of Iran. The fiercely existing animosity between the two nations is considered to have its routes from the previous decades and in major cases revolves around two main factors; the opposition that the Iranian government established towards the United States intruding into their domestic affairs which they considered not diplomatic in any sense, and what the Iranian government considers to be the United States aggression point. The organized coup that leads to the removal of Iran's Prime ministers in 1953 was an example of the United States intrusion in the internal and domestic affairs of Iran's government. In the past, Iran's government has accused the United States several times for interfering with the general peace of the country through the funding of anti-government organizations and communities within Iran. This has posed a severe hindrance for Iran's government to run their operations.

School of thought: Marxism

This piece by a lecturer at the University of Salford, UK, Moritz Pieper monitors and investigates some of the most serious impacts, which are associated with the relations between Russia and Iran's policy. The writer explains the intention of the Russian project, which aimed to learn more about Iran's nuclear program, and according to the Iranian government, this was a tactic by the United States to try and frustrate their achievement. Pieper tends to investigate how pulling out of the deal will enable the US to achieve a significant aspect of cultural homogeny, which can allow a peaceful existence and borrowing of the weaponry culture. He concludes that the US/Iran relations can be used in controlling how the latter uses her nuclear weaponry while interacting with other countries.

School of thought: Neo-Orientalism

Altwaiji, on the other hand, argued that ceasing US punishment on Iran would set them free to interact and learn from them. He also notes the current relations between Iran and the US is worse due to the view of other countries like Saudi Arabia, which feels that America is just after global dominance. Altwaiji states that ending the neo-orientalism in the US against Iran will be important in their weaponry matters. Altwaiji concludes that the neo-orientalism in the US against Iran will be important in their weaponry matters, and imposing sanctions on Iran will be important to control their power as well.

School of thought: Liberalism

Ali Fathollah-Nejad, an independent scholar and an associate professor at the Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center Iran focuses on how withdrawing from the sanction agreements can promote a considerable democratic relationship between the two countries which is important for their economic stability. The author concludes that a proper relation between countries is necessary for expressing an impression of equality between them. Pulling out of the agreement will allow the US to establish and maintain an important social relationship with Iran, which is a necessary aspect of the international relationships between various countries.

The Iranian government also considered the military aggression as another issue and a weighty point that needs to be put forth as they claim that the United States military has been oppressing their government through such struggles like supporting their opponent. The final and the major attacking point that the Iranian government clings to as one of the big issues between the two countries is the suctions that the United States is sticking to Iran. This according to the Iranian government has driven various issues in the economic balance of the two nations and most has affected the Iran government. This is mainly because the sanction majorly targeted the valuable export from Iran to the United States which includes the exportation of the much needed military and petroleum product and at the same time prohibiting the United States companies from investing in Iran which has really affected the economic status of the nation to summarize the whole idea is that the Iran political thought. The anti-American concept is running too deep and at a terrific speed and in regards to this, a serious measure needs to be taken otherwise a severe consequence will be realized.

The American Perspective

Despite the earlier cooperation between the two countries it was generally the overthrow of the United States Embassy in 1979 that brought about the discord and lack of proper between the United States and Iran, whose solution is tending to become a problem. However, according to the United States, the poor ties that their government has with the Iranian government is not a matter of what transpired thirty years ago but instead is based on the current nuclear program and the support of terrorism by the government of Iran. This is what the United States considered to be the most existing obstacle for the resumption of the relationships between the two countries. Based on the rese...