USDA 2019 Budget: $18B for Ag Programs, $5.8B Cut - Essay Sample

Introduction

The federal agricultural agency of the United States offers guidance on foodstuff, farming, ordinary possessions, country growth, sustenance, and linked matters established on a comprehensive civic procedure, scientific proof, and efficient control. The 2019 optional financial plan to support programs and working incidentals was $5.8billon less than the 2018 budget of were roughly $23.8 billion (McClure, 2019). The capital for the compulsory agendas was assessed to be one hundred and twenty-two billion dollars, which was one billion seven hundred million dollars more than the 2018 fiscal appropriations.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

In 2019, agricultural federal agency's expenses were valued at one hundred and forty billion dollars. The expenses for obligatory agendas were one hundred and seventeen billion dollars, which was 84 percent of the total expenditure (Fleischhacker, Moran & Bleich, 2019). The obligatory programs allow the provision of services by the law, although they are not sponsored by the annual appropriations act(McClure, 2019). The outstanding 16 percent of the total expenditures, was for optional programs like food security, countryside growth credits, and donations, exploration, and edification, among others. In 2019, outlays were: 71% of nutritional aid, 4% Forestry, 22% farm, conservation, and commodity programs, and others were 3%.

The U.S. sector of agriculture has a range of mission areas that are funded by the agency. The farm production and conservation mission area are comprised of; farm service support, a threat management agency, a natural resource preservation service, and FPAC center of business. They are further categorized into discretionary programs, optional emergency programs, compulsory programs, and other categories. For the fiscal year 2019 in comparison with 2018, the discretionary programs decreased while the mandatory remained constant with the commodity credit corporation programs

The discretionary emergency programs were not funded for the fiscal year 2019, unlike in 2018. The funding to the category of farm service agency increased from 10,085 to 12, 628; the risk management agency decreased from 8978 to 8751. The natural resource conservation service slightly increased by $69 from $4307. Under the FPAC Business center, the programs were not funded in 2018 but were funded $ 273 in 2019.

The trade and foreign agricultural affairs categories had a significant decrease from a total of $2458 to 599. Both the discretionary and mandatory market development programs were funded. The rural development agency's categories also showed a significant decrease in funding from $3144 to 2073. In the food and nutrition and customer services, the discretionary and mandatory program funding slightly decreased from $6803 to $5966 and 98069 to 96580, respectively (Fleischhacker et al., 2019). In contrast to the food safety mission area, the food safety and inspection services' categories showed a slight increase, with a total of the total food safety increasing from 1257 to 1272.

The natural resources environment's forest service funding slightly decreased from 6006 to 5172. Under the animal and plant wellbeing inspection services, the optional emergency agendas were not funded in 2019. The discretionary programs, on the other side, had a decrease from 996 to 742 while its mandatory funding programs increased slightly from 306 to 310. The agricultural marketing service program funding decreased in 2019 (Fleischhacker et al., 2019). The research, education, and economics funding program for fiscal 2019 decreased from 3067 to 2626 across all its agencies. The departmental activities' discretional programs decreased from $317 to 292, and the mandatory programs funding from 14 to 1 billion. The office of the inspector general's discretionary program funding went down from 98 to 87.

References

McClure, J. (2019). New Home for the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Economic Research Service. Crops, Soils, Agronomy News, 64(8), 16-19.

Fleischhacker, S., Moran, A., & Bleich, S. N. (2019). Legislative and executive branch developments affecting the United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. J. Food L. & Pol'y, 15, 131.