Trinity Community Hospital's Risk Assessment Paper Example

The Main Risk Factors Identified from the Assessment

From the needs assessment for the Trinity Community Hospital, it is evident that the main problems that jeopardize the workability of the facility are the increasing demand for critical services and intensifying pressure on the available equipment. These issues are prevalent in the major sections of the facility such as the oncology, orthopedic, and cardiovascular sectors. Notably, the functionality of the hospital facility is dependent on the capacity to address these critical issues, which are key quality determinants (Sandesara et al., 2015). One of the major roles of the hospital facility is to curb the spread of contagious illnesses and guarantee the safety of the residents and beneficiaries owing to excellent diagnosis and treatment procedures.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Some of the risks that are preventable through timely reaction to the assessment findings include the emergence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), increased cases of hospital readmission, and tainting the reputation of the healthcare facility on the account of failure to meet its functional duties to ensure health and safety standards of the people (Danasekaran, Mani, & Annadurai, 2017). These risks and uncertainties are bound to cause exorbitant expenses owing to the resources incurred to address them as organizational issues. Organizational effectiveness is one of the key functional standards the Trinity Community Hospital seeks to ascertain its role amid a needy public society (Danasekaran, Mani, & Annadurai, 2017). It is essential for the relevant facilitators to approach some of these persistent issues from an ethical wellness perspective that looks forward to better the services and products that are offered under the Trinity brand name.

Trinity Community Hospital's Efforts to Address the Risks and the Identified Needs

The healthcare facility's management is on the forefront to ensure the effective counter-measurement of the prevalent issues that almost render its operations obsolete. This is founded on the premise that hospital facilities are expected to meet and satisfactorily and sustainably quench the needs and requirements of the stakeholders (Sandesara et al., 2015). This premise grants power to critical groups of people such as the patients to access quality services and exposure to the necessary medication procedures owing to the sufficiency of the equipment and machinery that are required to facilitate professional treatment (Sandesara et al., 2015). The healthcare facility authorities are dedicated to prioritizing the identified needs and requirements at the organizational level. Some of the critical measures include informed investment in the establishment of various care facilities that guarantee effective diagnosis and treatment.

Further, the management is keen to guarantee the growth of the essential units such as training and employee engagement. These practices are aimed to equip practitioners with the correct version of skills and knowledge that can be wisely executed to enhance the competent application of the technicalities that guarantee proper enactment of organizational policies and practice guidelines that are designed to ensure timely healing (Ameri et al., 2018). As a result, the hospital management aims to lower the rate of incompetency the patients face whenever they are subjected to Trinity Community Hospital services. For instance, to improve the performance of the oncology section, the hospital management aims to ensure an effective spread of awareness and information regarding carcinogenic impacts. According to Ameri et al. (2018), it is an indubitable fact that in-depth understanding of the information regarding carcinogens and their mechanisms of disease causality enhances the control against cancer.

Excellent response to these issues guarantee the hospital's capacity to address the limitations to competent functionality. This postulate is built on the premise that needs identification leads to a call for excellent addressing to ensure that the practices are well-aligned to the needs and expectations of the people (Ameri et al., 2018). There is a need to address these risks and uncertainties to alleviate the cost of medication and guarantee quality treatment, which paves the way for patients' healing. Assessments ought to be routine and excellent in such organizations that borrow much from evidence-based analyses and feasibility for recommendations (). It is undeniably clear how the management and its decision-making procedure relies on the excavation for data and information that truly portray the situation of the organization with an aim to guarantee workable solutions.

Health Planning Summary

The Trinity Community Hospital is mandated to carrying out the right procedures toward addressing the identified needs and risks to improve the rank of service delivery. Notably, healthcare facilities are among the nonprofit organizations that are faced with a duty to ensure the people are assured of safety and healthy living standards and environments. This responsibility extends to the management of the critical roles of healthcare practitioners when it comes to advocating for safety treatment and effective diagnosis. According to Septimus and Schweizer (2016), it is necessary to critically prioritize the enhancement of the basic workability requirements for the healthcare system with a critical focus on meeting the needs of the imperative stakeholders such as patients.

Some of the essential practices that concur with the requirements and needs of the hospital fraternity include influential learning whereby healthcare practitioners, the patients, caregivers, and their families are effectively engaged to guarantee the proper spread of information and knowledge that articulates better care across the oncology, cardiovascular, and orthopedic sectors (Ameri et al., 2018). This recommendation for the Trinity facility is built on the premise that information and knowledge pave the way for wise judgments and decision-making, which grant better service delivery models to the entire fraternity (Septimus & Schweizer, 2016; Danasekaran, Mani, & Annadurai, 2017). Further, information brings about an in-depth understanding and appreciation of the policies, regulatory laws, and prescriptions that are driven by the need to heal the prevalent diseases among the patients (Ameri et al., 2018). Therefore, the proper use of this measure will guarantee a reduction in the number of hospital revisits owing to adherence to medication and comopliance3 with all the prevention requirements (Septimus & Schweizer, 2016). Similarly, the protection for the healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs) can be feasibly contained through the proper engagement and consideration of the influential stakeholders across the entire care and treatment sector.

References

Ameri, P., Canepa, M., Anker, M. S., Belenkov, Y., BerglerKlein, J., CohenSolal, A., & Ruschitska, F. (2018). Cancer diagnosis in patients with heart failure: epidemiology, clinical implications, and gaps in knowledge. European journal of heart failure, 20(5), 879-887. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ejhf.1165

Danasekaran, R., Mani, G., & Annadurai, K. (2017). Prevention of healthcare-associated infections: protecting patients, saving lives. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 1(1), 67-68. Retrieved from: https://ijcmph.com/index.php/ijcmph/article/download/1057/925

Sandesara, P. B., Lambert, C. T., Gordon, N. F., Fletcher, G. F., Franklin, B. A., Wenger, N. K., & Sperling, L. (2015). Cardiac rehabilitation and risk reduction: time to "rebrand and reinvigorate." Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 65(4), 389-395. Retrieved from: http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/accj/65/4/389.full.pdf

Septimus, E. J., & Schweizer, M. L. (2016). Decolonization in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Clinical microbiology reviews, 29(2), 201-222. Retrieved from: https://cmr.asm.org/content/cmr/29/2/201.full.pdf