The UK Should Have Second Brexit Referendum Paper Example

The campaign for a second referendum has been boosted by the dedication of labor in the backing of the referendum. A second Brexit referendum would definitely bring forth diverge consequences as explained by the thinkers of European Politics. Considering the current situation of the support established for the second referendum proposition, there is the possibility that by the end of 2019, a second BREXIT vote might take place. The previous consecutive party chairman Chris Patten is indeed set to make his declaration in relation to the second vote of UK'S withdrawal from the European Union. The question about the people's vote is still unanswered as prospects explain that the enlightenment of the supporters about the whole idea of BREXIT should be given the chance to vote again. Some of the scholars have argued that the previous BREXIT vote was just a simple NO or YES question without the current revelation of the BREXIT which has brought forth the political chaos. According to Dr. Francoise Boucek a political analyst concerned with the European politics, the one way to resolve the current political situation in the United Kingdom which is to give the people a chance with the second referendum. Boucek and Simon Bulmer are scholars who have dedicated much of their interest in the theoretical explanation of the political systems and policies of the European Union/. Adversarial European order supported these free thinkers to investigate Major situation at fundamental focuses. There are different models and approaches that have been used by the two thinkers in the approach of European politics. However, the current propositions that are being made in relation to the second vote of Brexit are limited to the willingness of issuing the people's voice. At that point according to Bulmer, then the choices being made by every government that takes charge will be done through the people of Britain. The following research paper is the explanation of the possibility of a second referendum for the British withdrawal from the European Union in relation to the ideologies of Boucek and Professor Simon Bulmer who are thinkers of the European politics.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

According to Boucek's many political theories and approaches, there are consequential changes which might be unexpected and which tend to develop from intra-party democracy needs which alter the structure of party organization. According to her interpretation of the party domination within the United Kingdom, there are the consequences that are visible in the current society and which have mostly been engineered by the political chaos after the BREXIT. Through this, there is the emergence of shock incarceration which is the period where one is exposed to the nature of prison for a short time then released back to the society threatened from the experience thus reducing the crime rates. Since the two methods are not very effective in the reduction of very serious crimes, there are other substitute methods that can be involved to save the situation. Westminster, a considerable load of get-together control falls on the social event head. In the explanation of her comparative research, striking the incentives in the correct way might not seem as obvious and easy as it sounds. Redressing the current democratic situation in the current might as well lead to the development of possible domains of restricting the actual vote from the people from taking place. However, the democracy can only be served to the citizens if the choice will be given to them to decide if at all they are okay with the system that the established, or is it necessary to create another channel of the division. In the analyses that have been made by Boucek, there is the revelation of rebellions that have been present in the conservative party despite the major success that Thatcher has received on her major policies. In addition, factionalism was introduced to her party that led to the damaging of the party.

Simon Bulmer argues that the United Kingdom has already adopted the European system of integration which is evident through the policy processes. In his argument, he introduces the question of whether the set adaptation has been a step-change or it has been a quiet revolution over time. He addresses the concept of Erupinisation which is the major constraint that has been a great influence upon the decisions in Britain. There is a need for the justice system to take into consideration the use of scientific evidence in the court of law in the effort of increasing the reliability of the evidence presented in the courtroom. The evidence presented is however supposed to be fully tested and proved to be true under the lawful procedures and thus can be relied upon. The independent party of Britain has been announced and awaited to be reclaimed as the reigning party in the region as expected. Having been part of the European Union, there are policies and institutions in the region which have been influenced by the European system which are the traits after the BREXIT. The relationship which has existed between the United Kingdom and the European Union has for a long ti9me become complex and at the same time troublesome. This is mainly as a result of the social/ political differences which have drawn several operational encounters thus limiting the level of interaction between the two systems. One of the most evident fruits of the relationship is the Brexit vote that was carried out and through the consequences that have been brought forth, there is the high likelihood that before the end of 2019, a second vote will be taken to create space for the voice of the people. In addition, the pressure surrounding the exiting of Britain from the European Union has led to the creation of a possibility that soon the voice of the people will be represented through a second vote and one that will be used to determine whether the choice to get out of the European Union has served the best interest of the general public.

Both scholars have drawn conclusions which have been used in the making of relevant discussion relating to the probable second vote which might be taken in 2019 in the representation of the people's vote on the issue of BREXIT (Journals.sagepub.com, 2019). It is important to understand that the social, political as well as the economic systems of the United Kingdom have been affected by the vote which was taken previously and which took Britain out of the constraints of the European Union. There are relative matters of discussion that have come up as well and which have been used in the building up of the ideology that there is the corruption of the systems of the European region and therefore, there is the inevitable process of second voting in Britain and which has to be expected. The debates surrounding Margret Thatcher's ideology of getting rid of the European barriers has influenced the decisions of the central government to restrict or allow trade regulations from the European Union. This was influenced by her signing of the single European Act which prompted a common market for the whole of Europe and the practice is present in the current European situation. Through the creation of a common market, there would be the abiding regulations as well as the principles which regulate the trading activities in the European region.

There are notable differences which are present between the theoretical approaches that have been applied by Bulmer and Bousec in the explanation of the probable vote for a British exit from the European Union for the second time( Bulmer, S. and Burch, M., 2013). According to Bulmer's approach to government reforms, there is the need to include the citizens who are the receivers of the policies as well as the reforms created. It is the responsibility of the government to issue the people chance to vote for the reforms and be active participants of the revolution. In the current vote for BREXIT which was carried out show that there was a limitation of the choices issued for the voting process which were only yes and no. However, theorists such as Bulmer have explained that a second vote is supposed to take place in the effort of involving the voice of the people in the legislative activities which will bring the cohesion in the matters of change under the European governance. As mentioned in the discussion above, Britain is to face worse economic and political challenges in a period of a few years in the case that a second vote that is being proposed will not take roots by the end of 2019 (Hobolt, S. 2016). This, therefore, means that there is moire than much willingness from the members of the public to participate in the anticipated vote from BREXIT and this time it will be the representation to the people's voice which is most likely to bring about the intended participation in BREXIT. In this foundation, the part governments must organize so as to discover consensual courses of action while staying watchful to the clearly politicized nature of European system at home. Eurozone emergency has empowered drifter thy-neighbor systems that hamper the finding of plan courses of action. On the other hand, the UK has moved from an intergovernmental state under Prime Minister Blair to a 'patriot' one under Cameron. Family unit publics are going about as making imprisonment on the EU as the last has rushed in into center state limits. The potential breakdown of the Schengen visa-free zone is a further factor. Disintegrative inclinations have been clear in the likelihood of a Greek exit from the Euro and a conceivable British exit from the EU. The Eurozone emergency expressly added to the 2014 race of a European Parliament including a solid Eurosceptic parcel (Boucek, F., 2005). The Lisbon Treaty may well have reached out between institutional powers, yet the EU's period of 'crisis regulatory issues' has had a generously increasingly basic effect on the relations between part states.

Conclusion

Answering to the question of power, Simon Bulmer explains that the exercise of power within the European region must be distinctive through the creation of boundaries which shows what and when the EU can act upon prevailing situations. This is following the various challenges that have been faced by the European Union following the withdrawal of Britain (Vasilopoulou, S., 2016). The re-exchange process has sustained this minimization which will, plainly, rely on the delayed consequence of the convenience (Sheffield, 2019). The consequences are distributed upon the economic, political as well as the social sectors of the states involved. Therefore, the relevant institutions are supposed to take charge of the ongoing exchanges relating to BREXIT. President Hollande needs budgetary improvement instead of gravity, at any rate, this does not concur with the necessities in Berlin. Unquestionable sorts of intensity can be penetrated in the European Council within the period of time designated. Trim power is definitely a method for wanting to stretch out blend or to offer new approach game-plans. Unlike the current situation of the Eurozone, it has in like way penetrated a quit Justice and Home Affairs framework to stay outside the all-out EU exertion to choose the evacuee emergency. The night out of power in the EU has unquestionably moved to Germany. This has been most apparent in the approach answers for Eurozone account holder states. English governments have been the recipients of such pick outs: from that in the Maastricht Treaty on not will point of fact join the single money. Where a state resolution to the contribution as part of the veto card ply, regardless, it dangers changing into aggravation and losing influence through declining legitimacy as an extra. A capacity for extraordinary arran...