Introduction
On a hot, bright and sunny day, I walked into the conference room after several weeks of anxiously waiting for the event. As I took my seat, I felt mentally, physically and emotionally well prepared for what the meeting had in store for the audience. Looking around the conference room, I caught a glimpse of Dr. Megan Stubb, a sexologist and relationship expert under whose authority the meeting was being held. Also present at the venue was Anna, the meeting's coordinator from the school's wellness center as well as other individuals from that group who merely sat in the audience and helped at the beginning to greet people upon their arrival. Moreover, as the program for the day begun, I realized that individuals from the wellness center on campus were also involved with the meeting. They introduced Dr. Megan to speak to the audience whereby she gave a one-hour long presentation in an event scheduled to address matters concerning Sex after Dark as well as provide sex education focused on issues concerning when to do it, how and with whom.
Actions
Despite Dr. Megan's one hour long presentation, it became evident that the meeting had no straightforward agenda. Instead, the event was more of a questionnaire presented to the audience accompanied by an elaborate response to each question from Dr. Megan. Moreover, unlike other events or occurrences, this particular meeting had no resultant actions to be carried out as it was more of an informative session. Regardless, the audience was allowed to participate in an anonymous vote conducted via an internet website namely 'pollev.com.'
Reflection
Furthermore, in the course of the meeting, some participants and member of the audience engaged with each other from both a critical action stance as well as from a missionary mindset. Such engagement between the audience and participants based on different mindsets resulted in the development of diverse points of view which were irreconcilable. Regardless, there was no judgment meted on any individual attending the event as the participants as well as the audience were well respectful of each other.
Moreover, as it's the case with any societal setting, issues such as class, gender, sex, socioeconomic status as well as other diversity issues affect an individual's voice among the public. They tend to influence who is or who is not heard, and how they are heard in addition to determining whose voice would be embraced the most among members of the society. However, in this case, such factors were not an issue during the meeting. On the contrary, everybody had the chance to talk and express their opinions. Nonetheless, from a personal point of view, I feel like some individuals felt embarrassed by the topic consequently contributing to their silence. Such a scenario, however, should not have been the case as the event was made up of a variety of people from different classes, race as well as gender thus there was no need or reason to feel ashamed.
Hence, by attending the event, I represented men who were curious about the topics addressed during the event. In particular, I was a representative of men interested in learning matters concerning sex toys since I have never had any personal encounters with such elements. Therefore, as a result of my group affiliation, I identified with the position that sex toys are not for men. Such an opinion underpinned by the lack of experience as well as limited know-how concerning sex toys. Moreover, I mainly agreed with matters discussed at the event due to affiliation with the speaker rather than the content of the argument since Dr. Megan is an expert in matters of sex and relationships.
Therefore, as a result of attending the event, I uncovered the myth that sex toys are strictly for lonely people. As clearly depicted by Dr. Megan, couples make use of sex toys to spice up their sex lives which have resulted in extreme levels of sexual satisfaction which consequently translates into longer-lasting relationships. Moreover, the meeting challenged my belief that sex toys are only meant for women. Such an assumption has been existent ever since I attained self-awareness regarding my sexuality and has been the driving force of my objection against using sex toys.
Conclusion
In conclusion, thanks to Dr. Megan's presentation, I am now open to using sex toys as a means of achieving sexual pleasure. As a result of an open-minded approach to sex toys, I stand a chance of enjoying a more fulfilling sexual life. Furthermore, such an open-mind to using sex toys provides the opportunity to achieve sexual satisfaction thus increasing the chances of experiencing a long-lasting relationship.
Reference
Stubbs, M. (2018). Sexologist Megan. Retrieved from www.sexologistmegan.com/
Cite this page
Ready to Learn: A Glimpse Into Dr. Megan Stubb's Sexology Conference. (2023, Jan 10). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/ready-to-learn-a-glimpse-into-dr-megan-stubbs-sexology-conference
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Research Paper on Gay Marriage as a Controversial Issue in America
- Canadian Definition of Gender Essay
- Essay Example on Sex: A Key to Enhancing Our Physical and Mental Health
- Teenage Pregnancy: Social, Economic & HIV Risks - Essay Sample
- Essay on Uprooting Discrimination: Governments Combatting Victimization of LGBT+ Individuals
- Essay Sample on Unveiling the Human Sexual Nature: Monogamy vs. Repression
- Free Research Paper Sample on Social Exclusion of People with Mental Illness: A Global Issue