International Relations Paper Example

Introduction

International Relations is a debate that rose because of anxiety. After the traumas of World War One, every government that was under the banner discipline struggled to reconcile the imperatives of the international political dynamics because of the global systems. In other words, this was known as a field situated of the normative and the empirical. According to E.H. Carr, he called for the science of international politics because of the blend of utopianism and realism as well as his liberal nemesis. Norman Angell on the other championed for the foreign moral policy and the rational empiricism as a general interest. Norman Angell lastly, discussed 'The Great Illusion and the impact of the military power in the nations both socially and economically. In this essay, we will argue why the writings were the poles of the emergent field as for why the political loomed large, in the anxieties of wanting to reconcile after the life-blood international inquiry and the things that facilitated the practical political change.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

After World War Two, the international relations theorists have always been on the struggle of escaping anxiety. Canonical figures such as Hans Morgenthau and Carrs discovered that defining politics was an essential prelude to theorize on the international relations because many scholars have been content to treat the political nature as an undefined event. Both writers had the same idea because they believed that the political relations between the other actors and the states are usually cast differently from different economic, social, moral or legal ties thus making the connections to be distinctive. Their central yet amorphous argument was that politics always struggled for rationality utility maximization, material power and formal relations between the political actors or the three into familiar and consistent contradictory concepts. The authors also felt that politics is a classic example of the conventional relationship between the ideas intellectual clarity and the disciplinary centrality.

To understand the concept of politics for international theory, it was important to revisit the remote works of the authors. While the classical theorist's politics stayed between the moral and instrumental concepts, the terms were solely defined regarding things that happened in the past and the present. The moves towards explaining the theory of international relations in the past lack consistency as set by Morgenthau in "Politics Among Nations" shared Carr's interest because of the probing nature of politics including the understanding of both politics and political science. The analysis of their texts reveals that the science of international politics never appeared at the intervals of utopianism and realism but in realism only. The dual purpose was to understand and detect the forces that made choices for the political relations in many nations and how it comprehended ways that the interactions political institutions and associations were affected by those forces.

Morgenthau used the quarantining of politics by using the critical theory to expound more on the containment of the international political science. Morgenthau also upheld the political sphere autonomy separately from the religious, moral, legal and economic spheres. He did this by admitting that "A real man is a composite of 'political man,' 'economic man, 'religious man' and a 'moral man.' Politically he argued that the primary concern is because of the completion of power and the concept of interest particularly when imposing intellectual discipline and infusing the rational order into politics. This makes it possible to understand the political side. The consistency of Morgenthaus to the views of science and the subject of international politics was, however, undermined by his classical vicissitudes and subtleties of the practices of human beings.

In the general debate of the international relations theory, another discussion came from Carr, the skeptical realist that was stripped off against the naive liberal internationals. The interpretation of international relations was fuelled under the 'twenty years crisis' to demolish the aspirations of Carr. For instance, as the characterization of Carr seen as an unalloyed realist is similar to the depiction of Angell concerning the ungrounded utopian. However, several differences have distinguished Carr's thoughts from that of the liberal vision of international relations and the existing conceptions of politics. Contrary to that, the central theme of Angell's writing was because of the consistency between facts and ideas that he believed they were dangerously attenuated. The basic aim of narrating 'The Great Illusion' was to show that the conventional wisdom saw the national wealth accumulation as a military conquest and zero-sum game as the rule of enriching the states under the realities of the independent and world economy.

The prevailing ideas according to Angell made war to become national aggrandizement under the economic realities because of self and futile destruction. Angell also argued that the international relations are a political science because of his passion of the; rational study of the world's politics.' His normative goal was for international security and peace pursued consistently through the economic realities. Angell approach was evident that his attitude was towards national peace and defense he also supported the balance between the practical men 'pragmatism and the 'Pacifist' ethics. Just like a scholarly endeavor would understand the international relations, Angell's idea of politics is less accessible and systematic than Carrs. Therefore the key to understanding this concept and elaborated by Angell is through a strategic and constitutive relevance to ideas in shaping the policy-relevant character. In contrast to Carr and Morgenthau, Angell stresses that the importance of the casual and principled beliefs is the definition of the national interest of international relations.

Conclusion

International Relations as elaborated is a debate that brought a lot of anxiety. The international relations theorists began expanding after the Second World War where Canonical figures such as Hans Morgenthau and Carrs discovered that defining politics was an essential prelude to theorize on the international relations. According to them, politics always struggled for rationality utility maximization, material power and formal relationships between the political actors. Therefore it was noticed in the analysis of their texts that the science of international politics only appeared in realism. Angell, on the other hand, had a different view because he argued that the international relations are political science. His ideas of politics are less accessible and systematic than Carrs.

References

Angell, N. (2013). The great illusion: A study of the relation of military power to national advantage. Queensland, Australia: Emereo Publishing.

Carr, E. H. (n.d.). Power in International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1960). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. 3rd ed. New York: A.A. Knopf.