Free Essay Sample: Risks Faced Australian Government

Introduction

In addition to supplying information assurance, the cyber threat to Australia's Department of Defense (DoD) also avoids the collapse of its systems. And Australia does not keep pace with its allies. This challenge is-. In order to inculcate the challenge of the cyber war in the production, procurement and fielding of all of its DD platforms, the USA has been using policies and practices in test and assessment (T&E) since 2009. Thus, US defense leaders realized at an early stage that their networks are operationally vulnerable to cyber warfare and that more cyber resilient networks are required. Australia has not asked T&E to do so and can thus be oblivious to its main platform's operating vulnerabilities.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Security threat occurs and hence is expected to continue to underinvest in cyber defense. For well over a decade, electronic warfare has become a rising threat. Austin (2016) recently identified what cyber warfare could look like in Australia and outlined the relevant difficulties. Australia is juxtaposed as Australia is between China's economic stability and the planning in the US and China. The U.S. alliance’s internal defense. Austin (2016) explains 'technologically conflict' as 'the continuing cyber-intended continuity of politics,' and he then suggests that "the needs of national security planning" are "best represented by the use of a term such as a 'cyber-enabled war,' because war of any kind constitutes an act involving states' political, economic and civilian capital, as well as their military technical capabilities." Of its ability. Of its ability. In this post, the Australian DD must be performed urgently cyber survival measures operationally based that exploit their partnership with the United States Places.-States. In the review of the increasing cyber security gap between the two close allies, the contribution of Article concludes that symbolic cyber risks in operational T&E are key first step in making every country recognize and invest in DoD Cyber infrastructure.

Risks Identification

The first significant risk facing Australia is the possibility of a cyber-security threats that could impact the economy through public facilities. Cyber defense is listed as a national security issue by the new Australian Government. In just the first year from 2011 to 2012, the Australian Cyber security department (DSD) registered 400 cyber-related accidents. Because of the number of accidents of cyber security of recent years. In both of these events, electronic government networks and public security were involved, both at national level and abroad, and cyber-attacks have raised by 260 percent from 2011 to 2014 . For the Government and the people of Australia, this notion of cyber-attack becomes increasingly widespread as both a possibility and a danger to Australian society. Attacks on network networks such as ransom ware may have a major public impact (Abrams & Weiss, 2008). These kinds of cyber threats are not limited to a public agency that is often vulnerable to these threats by Australian private companies. This cyber-attack risk has also been applied to the security of Australia (Brangwin) in 2009, where cyber-warfare is becoming a rising concern. That. That. There is a vital danger for the Australian government to have a chance of electronic warfare, where the possibility of disruptive cyber-attacks on government facilities would be negative. A crucial issue of national security in which the Australian government can continue its attempts to defend against the danger is the clean problem of disruptive cyber-attacks on Australia.

The risk of bio-security by smuggled goods from foreign countries is the secondary vital danger that the government faces. Import of an animal is a significant danger not only to the domestic farming industry, but also to the welfare of the consumer eating the goods. A radical quarantine protocol is now used by the Australian government. In which customs officers will inspect and search for pollutants which pose a danger to native Australian animals and the agriculture industries the imported good. The new government must take the diplomatic ties between the countries from which it imports into account. In exchange, Australia's diplomatic relations with these countries will be affected by the early quarantine protocol and the halting of shipments from alleged infected countries shipping to Australia. This suggestion of an introduction of biohazard by imports of livestock products would, in essence, adversely affect the local domestic agricultural industries. The losses caused to the epidemic in the past by a White Spot epidemic in Queensland, where the evidence showed that the outbreak was triggered by introduced crevices that ravaged the crawling economy of Australia, should also be investigated.

Recommendations

Continuing support for security services and improving cooperation between institutions are crucial proposals to counter the challenge of cyber stakes, including closer coordination with allied intelligence agencies such as the five-eye intelligence group. More defense on the human side as well, which effectively enhances the use of human intelligence (HUMINT) in combating the social risk of cyber-attacks. It is crucial to change the policy-making component as most successful to cope with challenges (Jennings and Feakin 2013). This advice is also necessary. Another valuable advice is to develop or upgrade an established risk-based strategy where this is necessary for all vital threats in the event of a cyber-attack. This also addresses the concept of responding to future cyber-attacks (Luiijf et al., 2013). This involves Additional studies on older systems and applications should be supported for security checking. Where modern technologies and applications can be developed to enhance protection against future cyber threats. Such a type of weakness can also be extended to individual operating properties from the government sector (Joiner 2017). In general, there are several guidelines on increasing cyber security for the Australian government. In addition, it is necessary to remember that these guidelines will only serve to reduce the possibility of future cyber threats. However, the entire possibility of a cyber-attack cannot be removed.

The best guidance to reduce the chances of a biosecurity failure is to amend the existing biosecurity guidelines for products purchased from abroad. This involves building and encouraging open communications between border services and other Australian law enforcement authorities, which can avoid or decrease the risk of an epidemic by exchanging information. The development of communications between private entities and border controls also requires free communication. Moreover, the Australian Government should also understand that these biosecurity procedures have made a significant error or ignored by customs authorities, resulting in a white spot burst that had major consequences on Australian creeks and Australian export economy (Guest 2016). Further protection mechanisms to deter potential threats of violation are also important. The possible likelihood of biosecurity failure can also be minimized by improving the training of border officers. In addition, by growing the annual border guards' salary, future abuse on the job will be minimized. Another significant advice is to periodically monitor goods for implants at the boundaries and to support the latest guidelines to ensure potential security for Australia's farming and native animals industries. In essence, the impact of future biosecurity will be improved by the upgrading of disease prevention steps. This can be advised. It just serves to reduce the cumulative probability of another epidemic in biosecurity. There is still the likelihood that a danger can occur; only the potential risk may be decreased.

Reference List

Abrams, M. and Weiss, J., 2008. Malicious control system cyber security attack case study–Maroochy Water Services, Australia. McLean, VA: The MITRE Corporation. https://www.shapesecurity.com/web-application-security/2018-credential-spill-report?utm_medium=cpc&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=amer_sc_appfraud&utm_content=rpBeggs, C. and Warren, M., 2009. Safeguarding Australia from cyber-terrorism: a proposed cyber-terrorism SCADA risk framework for industry adoption.

Jennings, P. and freakin, T. (2013). [online] S3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com. Available at: https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/ad-aspi/import/SR51_agenda_cybersecurity.pdf?iM9f3lwsLwUiNR0mhk46eFXX3Moa4XBT [Accessed 2 Oct. 2019].

Joiner, K. (2017). How Australia can catch up to U.S. cyber resilience by understanding that cyber survivability test and evaluation drives defense investment. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 26(2), pp.74-84.

Joiner, K.F., 2017. How Australia can catch up to US cyber resilience by understanding that cyber survivability test and evaluation drives defense investment. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 26(2), pp.74-84. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19393555.2017.1293198

Luiijf, E., Besseling, K. and Graaf, P. (2013). Nineteen national cyber security strategies. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 9(1/2), p.3.

Maye, D., Dibden, J., Higgins, V. and Potter, C., 2012. Governing biosecurity in a neoliberal world: comparative perspectives from Australia and the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), pp.150-168.

Meyerson, L.A. and Reaser, J.K., 2002. Biosecurity: Moving toward a Comprehensive Approach: A comprehensive approach to biosecurity is necessary to minimize the risk of harm caused by non-native organisms to agriculture, the economy, the environment, and human health. BioScience, 52(7), pp.593-600.

Murray, G. and Koob, P., 2004. Biosecurity in Australian agriculture. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, The, 19(3), p.5.

Thompson, R.A., Owen, I.L., Puana, I., Banks, D., Davis, T.M. and Reid, S.A., 2003. Parasites and biosecurity–the example of Australia. TRENDS in Parasitology, 19(9), pp.410-416.

Webb, T. and Dayal, S., 2017. Building the wall: Addressing cybersecurity risks in medical devices in the USA and Australia. Computer Law & Security Review, 33(4), pp.559-563.