Evaluating Method for Info Sys Dev: Staff Members Criteria - Essay Sample

Introduction

The choice of the best method that would be used in information system development has to be critically evaluated. Evaluating the method ensures that their positive and negative sides are assessed. In the above scenario, several criteria were identified and can be used.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Staff Members

The first criteria for evaluating the method to be used in information system development are the staff (Kara, 2012). This criterion identifies whether the staff has to be involved in the methods to be used in information system development. In this case, the staff needs to be included in the development process because this aspect will help their needs to be known well (Dagdeviren 2010). Therefore, when the new information system is developed, all these needs will be incorporated. From the case study, this criteria is vital because all the 41 IT staff will be able to present various needs concerning the new system.

As the new system is developed, all these needs will be incorporated, and it will be able to attain its intended objective which is to store all the company's information in a web based management system. The different approaches that can be used to develop a new information system are governed by various rules (Fraser and Arcuri, 2011). For instance, in the structured approach, one of the rule is to ensure that all the steps are followed for the program to be designed effectively. Therefore, involving the staff while using this method is essential because it will help to ensure they are taken through all the steps of the information system development so that in the end, they will understand how the system operates.

Secondly, the main rule when using the dynamic method of information system development is to involve the users. Involving the users helps them to be aware of all the aspects of the system. Therefore, when the system is complete, it will be easy when using it to handle various activities. Thirdly, the object oriented approach can be used to develop a new system whereby the main rule is to create a model (Batra, Xia, VanderMeer, and Dutta, 2010). In this case, it is essential to involve the users in the models created so that they will become familiar with the new system after it has been fully developed.

Experience of the Team

The second criteria that can be used is the experience of the team (Niu, Da Xu, and Bi, 2013). The use of an information system requires a lot of experience to achieve its potential. In this case, when choosing the method to develop new information, it is essential to pay attention to the team's experience. The main importance of looking at the experience of the team from the case study is that it will ensure that when the new information system is incorporated into the organization, it will be easily used to improve productivity (Prat, Comyn-Wattiau, and Akoka 2014). When using the structured approach, the most suitable rule that matches this criterion to break down a complex process into simpler ones. This rule is critical in the sense that it makes its easy for employees with little experience to understand how the new system works. Also, when using the dynamic approach, the main rule expected of it is to ensure all the users are included. This rule matches this criterion because when the users are involved in the development of the new information system, their experience concerning the use of the new system increases (Jalote, 2012). Furthermore, when using the object-oriented model whose primary rule is to develop a model that resembles the final system, it ensures that this criterial is matches as the team learns to interact with the system at its early stages (Mall, 2018). This interaction helps to ensure that the team develops experience regarding the use of the new information system.

Understanding the Requirements in Advances

Thirdly, it is essential to know the requirements in advance (Oliveira and Martins, 2011). At the time of selecting the method to be used in developing the new system, it is essential to identify all the possible requirements. The main importance of this criteria from the case study is that it ensures all the requirements are included in the new information system and that all the intended purposes have been attained. Since one of the rules of the structured approach is to break the process into more straightforward steps, all the requirements have to be known so that they can be included (Bruegge and Dutoit, 2009). Also, when using the dynamic approach, the main rule is to include the staff in the system development. Having the team around when developing the system matches this criterial as it ensures all the requirements are known in advance(Langrial, Lehto, Oinas-Kukkonen and Harjumaa, 2012). Moreover, the main rule that governs object-oriented method is the creation of a model representing how the final system will look like. This rule matches this criteria because it will help to understand the requirement that may be needed to improve the model so that the final system becomes effective.

The Cost of the Project

The cost of the project is the fourth criterion that can be used for evaluation (Rasimah, Ahmad, and Zaman, 2011). A lot of money and resources are usually spent when developing a new information system. In this scenario, adequate budgeting should be done to ensure that there is enough money for the method that will be used to create a new system. Moreover, this criteria is essential because it will ensure that chosen method is within the budget of the organization to prevent the company from going into financial constraints (Politis, Papaioannou, and Basbas, 2010).

The main rule of the structured approach is to simplify the process of system development. This rule matches this particular criterion since breaking down the system into smaller steps will reduce the cost of the project hence making it affordable (Gendron, Pourroy, Carron, and Marty, 2012). Also, when using the dynamic approach whose model is to involve the users, the cost of the project may be reduced as they users may offer insights on approaches that may be used to lower the costs. Also, the main rule of the object-oriented approach is to ensure that the model is created first (Singh, and Malhotra, 2012). This rule matches this criteria in that the model created will help in reducing the cost of the project as some of the resources that may be unnecessary may be dropped at this point.

Time

The fifth criterion that can is time (Tan, Teo, and Benbasat, 2010). In most cases, most of the information systems are required within a short time to help in carrying various operations for the company. From the case study, evaluating the time to accomplish the new system is important because it ensures that it is delivered on time. This criterion matches the main rule of the structured approach because when the complex steps are broken down into simple processes, less time will be spent to accomplish the project.

References

Batra, D., Xia, W., VanderMeer, D.E., and Dutta, K., 2010. Balancing agile and structureddevelopment approaches to successfully manage large distributed software projects: Acase study from the cruise line industry. CAIS, 27, p.21.

Bruegge, B., and Dutoit, A.H., 2009. Object-Oriented Software Engineering. Using UML,Patterns, and Java. Learning, 5(6), p.7.

Dagdeviren, M., 2010. A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for personnel selection inmanufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 21(4), pp.451-460.

Fraser, G., and Arcuri, A., 2011, September. EvoSuite: automatic test suite generation for object-oriented software. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSOFT symposium and the 13thEuropean Conference on Foundations of software engineering (pp. 416-419). ACM.

Gendron, E., Pourroy, F., Carron, T., and Marty, J.C., 2012. Towards a structured approach tothe definition of indicators for collaborative activities in engineering design. Journal ofEngineering Design, 23(3), pp.195-216.

Jalote, P., 2012. An integrated approach to software engineering. Springer Science & BusinessMedia.

Kara, M., 2012. Review common criteria as a secure software development model -International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 4(2), p.83.

Langrial, S., Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M., and Karppinen, P., 2012, July.Native Mobile Applications for Personal Well-Being: A Persuasive Systems DesignEvaluation. In PACIS (p. 93).

Mall, R., 2018. Fundamentals of software engineering. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Niu, N., Da Xu, L., & Bi, Z. (2013). Enterprise information systems architecture-Analysis andevaluation. IEEE Transactions concerning Industrial Informatics, 9(4), 2147-2154.

Oliveira, T., and Martins, M.F., 2011. Literature review of information technology adoption atthe firm level - Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), p.110.

Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., Basbas, S., and Dimitriadis, N., 2010. Evaluation of a bus passengerinformation system from the users' point of view in the city of Thessaloniki,Greece. Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1), pp.249-255.

Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I. and Akoka, J., 2014, June. Artifact Evaluation in InformationSystems Design-Science Research-a Holistic View. In PACIS (p. 23).

Rasimah, C.M.Y., Ahmad, A., and Zaman, H.B., 2011. Evaluation of user acceptance of mixedreality technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(8).

Singh, Y. and Malhotra, R., 2012. Object-oriented software engineering. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

Tan, C.H., Teo, H.H., and Benbasat, I., 2010. Assessing screening and evaluation decisionsupport systems: A resource-matching approach. Information Systems Research, 21(2),pp.305-326.