Introduction
Religious fundamentalism is a subject that has been on a global scale for a very long time now. Religious fundamentalism is strict adherence and belief in a particular religion and denomination. In the modern worlds, the extent of religious fundamentalism has really grown to espouse the liked of Christianity, Islam, Shintoism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism among other faiths. Most of these religious faiths share so much in common with very little difference between them. In essence, the common cutting line among the entire listed religions id the factual acceptance that God is the creator of all things. There is also a common faith and trust on the clear line between wrong and right, good and evil (Oppong, 2013). The discussion on the view on good and evil which has been attributed to the morality has also been shared by a number of many other faithful believers; but just how does this apply in different religious contexts of the various religious orientations is a matter of research.
Christianity is a religious faith founded on the basic fundamentals of morality. According to the Christian faith, it is quite obvious that the Godly thing to do is basically to do everything good that pleases God. However, what exactly is it that pleases God (Davies, 2013). The aspects of conscience are what trigger the line between good and evil. The guilty conscience, according the Christianity is the drive and the roadmap that guides the aspect of good and evil. In essence, it is important to be cognizant of the prospects of understanding the power of good and the beating of everything evil. According to Christianity, the principality of good and evil is summarized in Jesus' teachings about love (Oppong, 2013). The first love is to God the creator of the universe while the second love is for neighbours. Therefore, anything that goes against God and that confronts neighbour's feelings is evil.
The view of good and evil is a subject that has not only been compounded in Christian teachings but in a number of other religious teachings as well. In Islam for instance, the understanding of good and evil is clearly cut down to the teachings of Prophet Muhammad. The prophetic teachings in the Islam religions are the sole pointer to the right and wrong. According to the Islamic religion which has come under sharp criticism in the recent past over what observers see as radicalization against other teachings which has seen a rise in terror activities, the teaching on good and right is quite explicit. It is quite appalling to realize that the place of the general public good.
There has been general confusion in the overall public and the followers of different religions concerning the understanding of the place of good and evil in society. In this case, therefore, it is a confusing aspect of life in an attempt to raise a sufficient understanding of what determines what is good and what is wrong (Oppong, 2013). In the same aspect, religious leaders have been under a great deal of pressure to come up with a common ground across different religious beliefs and faiths to have a common ground that cuts across various religious groups on the aspect of good and evil.
In the Jew community, the aspect f evil and good corresponds closely to the teaching s of the Jewish community. It is an understandable concept that the overall good and wrongdoing of the community is decided by a group of persons. However, this aspect of deciding what is good and wrong has been seen the religious leadership come at loggerheads with various government officials (Mackie, 2014). Some of the religious practices which may appear good in the religious contexts may be evil in the eyes of the government. In the same concept, thereof, it is upon the relevant religious leaders to ensure that they do not confuse issues in as far as deciding what is good and evil is concerned
In some religious concepts, evil is attributed to the devil or dark forces while good is attributed to Godliness. This approach of good and evil is quite confusing in many aspects. For instance, it literally means that the evil in the society should not be punished since it is the work of the devil in their lives. However, according to the principality of humanity, evil should be punished commensurately to the extent of the evil committed (Mackie, 2014). It is on the same principles that Buddhism recommends for instant punishment for all the people considered as evil in the community. In some cases, evil punishment leads to excommunication.
While the religious leaderships still grapples with the creation of a standard agreement concerning the issues of good and evil, there is still sufficient trust that ethics and leadership go hand in hand. The correlation between the two aspects of belief is pegged on the premise of conscience (Davies, 2013). The respect of laws f the land as well as respect and honouring the rights of others are busting some of the reasoning that goes hand in hand with the religious belief in good and evil.
References
Davies, J. (2013). Death, burial and rebirth in the religions of antiquity. Routledge.Mackie, J. L. (2014). Evil and omnipotence. Philosophy of Religion: An Anthology, 64, 256.
Oppong, S. H. (2013). Religion and identity. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(6), 10-16.
Cite this page
Essay Sample on Religious View of Good and Evil. (2022, Nov 30). Retrieved from https://proessays.net/essays/essay-sample-on-religious-view-of-good-and-evil
If you are the original author of this essay and no longer wish to have it published on the ProEssays website, please click below to request its removal:
- Whether God Exists Essay
- Scott Samuelson "The Deepest Human Life" Essay
- An Exposition of Foundationalism and Essentialism Essay
- Confucian's Ideologies About Mozi and Mohist Essay
- Essay on Buddhism and Daoism: Solving Social Issues Through Spiritual Practice.
- Essay on Exploring Christianity in the Modern Age: Uncovering the Truth
- Free Report Example on Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: Challenges and Solutions