Essay Sample on Interpersonal Communication: Inescapable, Irreversible, Complicated & Contextual

Principles/Concepts of Interpersonal Communication

Interpersonal communication is inescapable, irreversible, complicated, and contextual. The latter is complicated since not only the words are important but also the non-verbal cues, pitch, and tone used while passing the message. Therefore, bother sender and audience should impart vast levels of these concepts for effective and competent communication to transpire (Manusov, 2020). Additionally, the spoken words are irreversible irrespective of their nature, good or offensive. Thus, communicators should take much caution, having the background of the audience in their while choosing their words (DeVito, 2019). The above-listed principles are socially imperative since they improve the interpersonal communication skills of people. Thus, facilitating cohesion, understanding, peace, and unity both the individual level (romantic relationships) and societal levels.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Summary about the Source and Concepts of Interpersonal Communication

The source is a fictional non-textbook that access how exposure to TV portraying interpersonal conflicts and controlling in romantic relationships between partners. It's an ideal source since often there are high levels of deception between partners during both face-to-face and phone conversations. During face-to-face, interpersonal communication partners deceive each other on when they have been or when they are going mostly when cheating is involved. Similarly, during phone conversations between cheating partners, deception about where they are, what they are doing, and who their company is often seen.

Literature Review

Mach (2014) acknowledges that whenever media/television is used as a medium of communication while passing information, there are high cases of deceptions as compared to when dairies are used. Although the application of television as a medium of communication was acknowledged to be more efficient and faster, the charges involved were high and expensive. Television is an ideal tool for controlling various romantic relationships when passing information. However, it created unprecedented exposure, which can initiate cases of interpersonal conflicts (Mach, 2014). Therefore, deception is the creation of false massages among the communicators, or it is the attempt to pass untrue information to the listeners to achieve a specific goal.

Similarly, Robb & Alastair (2008) ascertains that deception is governed by the emotions that lead the two parties into conflicts. Also, it is viewed that one party stands to gain in the affair, while the other one unaware loses. Therefore, this concept of deception has been categorized into various strategies, such as lies, exaggerations, diversionary responses, half-truth, and secrets (Robb & Alastair, 2008). Robb & Alastair (2008) also asserts that all of the individuals, to minimize the information to the other party, they let one party gain at the cost of the other party.

However, Charmaz (2006) argues that the motives of deception are best classified on the interests of the party wishing to deceive the other. Therefore, in a romantic relationship, this is inspired by the concern of the partner. However, this is accompanied by a lot of implications in the sense that the participants may not understand what leads to their motives (Charmaz, 2006). Although deception is meant to threaten trust, it is also preferred under certain circumstances. For example, an honest individual may become a social isolate and also may make the relationship complex (Charmaz, 2006). However, a romantic relationship also requires a little bit of deception to understand their partners' reactions to other sides. Therefore, this can be achieved if both parties use the right communication tool and control in their relationships.

Methodology

The study used undergraduate students for investigation, from Midwestern University, who were recruited through word of mouth. The participants in this study were recruited based on a random basis to avoid bias. The study involved thirty participants, as this number was deemed significant enough to possess the necessary characteristics of a sample population. Besides, the population is not too large to bring complexities in the analysis. The demographics of the studied population are; ages 20-30, male and female, non-working population, and individuals who have had a romantic relationship. To add to this, all the methods and procedures were approved by the university board. Data collection procedures were given, where the participants were given behavioral examples, pocket-size note diaries which were supposed to be field. The data was gathered primarily through questionnaires administered to the students. However, observation of the possible intimacy in romantic relationships, as evidenced by body language, was also a data-gathering tool.

Findings and Discussion

The results of the study indicated that, on average, partners cheated on their partners more than once a day. However, the articles state that only two participants reported not to cheat on their partners in a week. They indicated that they do not talk about their deception issues with their partners. From the study, the limitations of the study were that; the participants refrained from making entries in the diary, did not have a clue when the deception was to happen, and that they could not follow the directive of compiling the data correctly. The implications are that for a detailed understanding of the deception in romantic relationships, future researchers should include both aspects of quantitative and qualitative research. Since most of the articles reviewed could not identify the exact solution to deception.

References

Charmaz, K. C. (2006, January 18). A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Constructing Grounded Theory.

DeVito, J. A. (2019). Interpersonal communication books. Instructor, 1, 18.

Mach, L. E. (2014, March 31). Why deception is not Acceptable use of Language. A society of Truth.

Manusov, V. (2020). Foreword to the special issue on enhancing interpersonal engagement: concepts for optimal communication. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 28(1), 1-4.

Robb, F., & Alastair, G. (2008). Deception and Computer-Mediated Communication in Daily Life. Communication Reports, 21(2), 92-103.