Essay Sample on Gig Economy

Introduction

The problem of gig economy is still work in progress with many solutions coming into question with many jurisdictions experiencing the same. Some of the gig economy organizations have expressed displeasure in their follow up suggesting that they should be left alone. Consequently, other industry-specific regulations have been proposed for instance ridesharing laws that will help govern companies in the transport network. There is a need to be observant of "disruptive innovation" that it might not become a code word for defying the law with manipulation of incognito technology. This is not an attack on technological innovation but rather a question of whether this value creation is provided in the business model of service or is a value abstraction through governing arbitrage.

There is a need to carefully develop existing frameworks and laws looking at definite protection for individual groups of workers and accumulating them to current structures. Anderson, Brodie, and Riley (2017) indicate that there is no need to reinvent another wheel for the vehicle but rather ensure that people are classified as workers receiving basic protection and minimum wage, and then it will give room to look at other problems that may arise. This does not mean that technology should not be embraced for instance the platform of rating functions for workers. If for instance the rating is taken as the property of the worker then Uber drivers can adopt this rating to lift up their bargaining power which is also an element of entrepreneurship. This technological culture is there to offer a solution, but it requires the right regulatory oversight and culture.

According to the Law Society, the government should engage to salvage the position of workers in the United Kingdom to support their rights and that people working in the gig market should be assumed to have employment status and so they should be entitled to rights of minimum wage and retirement pension unless the employer can demonstrate otherwise (Anderson, Brodie & Riley, 2017). Corrupt organizations working in the gig economy may purposely allude to an independently employed status in contracts, bearing in mind that they will trust that no individual, organization, or body will question their rights, but the significant thing is that courts look beyond the wording. Anderson, Brodie, and Riley (2017) further suggest that there are also clauses in their contracts that prevent individuals from challenging their employment status regarding claims. What the courts do is look at what is occurring inside the association, and settle on a choice in light of the specific conditions.

The most significant challenge for individuals working in the gig economy is that the shift arrangements are commonplace and ins some cases there is no mutual obligation between the shifts. In any case, it will not be anything but difficult to roll out improvements, since there will dependably be a mutual obligation for a legally binding relationship to exist. The law needs to perceive the refinement between the individuals who are adequately controlled by an association, the individuals who have somewhat looser courses of action, and the individuals who are really in business sacrificing rights for more prominent adaptability.

There are a lot of legal benefits when workers are recognized and categorized by law. This is the only way that provides for the current position of work and also provides them with a minimum level of rights even when they are not recognized as employees. There is a need to introduce workers' status should be preserved, and a new definition of a worker should be created to enable individuals to understand their rights and status so they will have less need to litigate for their status clarification. All the employees who exist in the employment law - workers, employees, and self-employed contractors should be entitled to a unified set of rights.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Even though the gig economy has been welcomed, the laws struggle to respond to all the prevalence and characteristics of employment that is on the rise. The United Kingdom law already has an intermediary grouping between the role of contractors and employees, and yet the problem of the gig economy has not been solved. There is a need for the United Kingdom government to make changes to the rights and working conditions that gig workers are entitled to. The legislator needs to execute a work plan that ensures vulnerable workers' rights are protected. Gig economy organizations need to ensure that all workers are provided with their basic rights regarding working hours, holidays, health, and financial security on flexible contracts. Currently, the gig economy has not well been defined because they fall somewhere between worker classification which entails employee and self-employed. Workers' status means that they are entitled to a minimum level of paid holidays, a national living wage, and basic protections against discrimination. The United Kingdom government should launch a series of consultations on the enforcement of employment rights, employment status, and measures that will increase transparency in the labor market. There is a need to carefully develop existing frameworks and laws looking at definite protection for individual groups of workers and accumulating them to current structures. There is no need to reinvent another wheel for the vehicle but rather ensure that people are classified as workers receiving basic protection and minimum wage, and then it will give room to look at other problems t...