Essay on Doesnotexistan's Ban on Milk from FakeCountry: Who Caused It?

Introduction

In the case provided, the country of Doesnotexistan places a ban or embargo on milk originating from the FakeCountry. This follows the development of chemical weapons by the FakeCountry to protect its borders. FakeCountry exports about 57% of the milk; thus, the embargo would significantly have an impact on them.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Who (or what) caused this incident?

The incident here is caused by the FakeCountry's development of chemical weapons to protect the borders. On the other hand, the event could be blamed on the border terrorist or attackers who have made it necessary for the FakeCountry to develop chemical weapons. As such, they have the right to the development of evidence that is necessary for the protection of the borders.

Who did this incident impact?

The incident had significant impacts on both the two countries. For instance, since milk makes up about 57% of the FakeCountry's export, they would be significantly affected by the embargo. Again, milk also forms about 23% of FakeCountry's import. Thus, they are affected as well.

What is the problem for the group from answer #2?

The problem by FakeCountry is the production of chemical weapons through the milk. As such, Doesnotexistian issues an embargo proclamation against milk import from FakeCountry.

What would that group want to do for the future?

FakeCountry could be convinced by the Doesnotexistan to denuclearize through increasing the import quotas and reducing the existing tariffs that are currently in place. This could be possible if the Doesnotexistian agrees to remove the embargoes on FakeCountry. The imports and tariffs are often put in place as a way of protecting domestic producers against any foreign competition. The profits would significantly be increased by not allowing FakeCountry to export more goods as well as reducing any tariffs.

What is the main problem this incident caused by the group in #3?

It is noteworthy that FakeCountry, through its action, is mainly to protect its borders. On the other hand, the country of Doesnotexistian has the feeling that it has the right to protect both its borders and the people within the state. Looking at the issue from the two viewpoints, it is compelling and evident that FakeCountry has an absolute advantage of milk production because of the large amount of import of the goods to the state.

What course theory would apply to this incident?

In this case, Utilitarianism theory could be adopted.

What does that course theory say about this incident?

The theory stipulates that an action is judged as good or bad based on the impacts that it has on the general public. In this case, the embargo was justified because it was based on the provision of security for the citizens of the country.

Are there similar incidents that have happened to other businesses?

Embargo relates to the order by the government that often restricts commerce with a particular country as well as the exchange of some goods. A similar example was UN sanctions on North Korea. The embargo prohibited the supply of various heavy weapons and some luxury goods. However, the UN permitted humanitarian aids to North Korea. This was in response to the first nuclear test that was conducted by North Korea.

What questions do you still have about this issue?

The questions that may arise from the issue relates to the difference between sanctions and embargoes.

Where can you find the information to help you answer those questions?

Such questions could be addressed by the provisions of the United Nations Security Council, which has a definition of what constitutes an embargo as well as the sanction.

What do those sources tell you about the issue in this case?

According to the United Security Council, an embargo relates to a complete prohibition of trade between two countries. In the context of a ban, no goods or services are supposed to be imported from or exported to the embargoed nation. For instance, the US had initiated a trade embargo with Cuba, although with certain limited circumstances e.g., the export of agricultural and food products.

On the other hand, sanctions involve the prohibition on some products and services to another country because of some obvious reasons as such sanctions could be described as partial embargoes because they restrict trade in certain areas.

What action would prevent this issue from happening again, or end it if it is still occurring now?

The issue can be prevented from happening again through the formulation of respective policies and agreements between the two countries regarding the goods to be imported and exported. Such systems may be binding for the trade between the two countries.

Would the solution in number 13 work for the parties in #2 and #3?

The solution would work for Doesnotexistian as well as FakeCountry. They could have mutual agreements regarding the goods and services that they are both involved in. Such contracts would ensure both parties obtain profit from the trade without compromising each other's security.

What other solution would solve the issue and work for both parties?

Both parties could also eliminate the embargoes through trade agreements. Such trade agreements would stipulate the specifications of the goods as services, both the countries in which both the states would be dealing. Such trade agreements would shed off any insecurity doubts by any country.