Essay Example on Class Conflict in Modern Society: An Analysis of Dahrendorf's Theory

Ralf Dahrendorf Conflict Theory explicitly examines and manifests the societal class dichotomies in the current dynamic world. In his philosophical research findings, it is noted that conflicts are part and parcel of daily human activities, with different people having varied classical interests relational to social misunderstandings and mutual transitions. Extensive comparative analyses and intense studies of this theory utterly depict and exclusively focuses on authoritative consideration of society. These encompass both the inevitable, integrative social forces and causative conflict agents or instead conflict initiators and catalyzers (Tittenbrun, 2013). The concept significantly incorporates an imperatively coordinative association of social structures in society. On the other hand, they include the classes of concern, rulers, and the individuals being ruled, whose responsibilities are defined in terms of duty-anticipations criterion in the modern world.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

In sociology and today's BLM movements concerning police mistreatments and racial segregation in the States, the Ralf Dahrendorf's conflict theory extensively help sociological philosophers and the general public to properly comprehend how a community should operate to enhance mutual coexistence. The Ralf's conflict theory promotes total member involvement in society functions towards ensuring that everyone involved is capable of acquiring optimal merits of opportunities, which in the long run, exponentially escalates social transformations for mutual benefits. The significant aspects of conflict theory are inclusive of socialism and communism, which emerges between different social class dichotomies with inherently complicated conflicts (Tittenbrun, 2013). Over the recent past, according to daily global news updates and philosophical professionals' ideologies, the States, for instance, has been an epitome of racism and police brutality menaces that ultimately targeted) native Americans. As a result, there sprout social equality and justice movements branded 'Black Lives Matter,' which mainly enlightened the general world population about racism promoted by police in service.

According to Dahrendorf, conflict management and control among groups or various groups should include the utilization of formal and informal techniques amid rules and regulation enforcement process. He supports that such approaches are essential in proper, and effective suppression of hatred, and drastic reduction of social animosities, which would instead catalyze development and eruption of conflicts among societal classes. Such Ralf's animosity regulative measure plays significant roles in the current Black Lives Matter, presidency movements as they encourage rebellious conflict resolution mechanisms. Besides, they anticipate for peaceful demonstrations, which are inevitably evident across the globe with people severely fighting for racial identity and equal opportunities for everyone regardless of their cultural origins, color, communal norms, religion or ideological variations (Weingart, 1969). In so doing, this approach's application has significantly aided control of the blatant daily forms of racism and unfair social hatred through optimal embracement of deterrents to the weak coercion by their strong counterpart fellows.

The in-depth comparative analogy of the ancient and modern conflicts utterly manifests dynamicity in the hierarchical dominance in the modern world pertaining to the applicative mechanisms in the modes of coercion and persuasions. In other words, Dahrendorf ultimately contemplates social hostilities as an unavoidable menace, which is often backed up by the widespread low conduction of decision-making processes that, in most cases, does not include ideologies of native residents. Using the States as an example, most blacks, daily, complain of non-inclusive leadership mechanisms that only considers the ideological contributions of White Americans as a superior race. But contemptuously disregards Blacks' contribution and instead render them, Native Americans, useless, ultimately segregated and severely subjected to massive oppressive treatments.

Today's emerging social trends like the pre-stated BLM (Black Lives Matter) and presidency, among other socially oppressive treatments of different races across the globe, are well stipulated in the Dahrendorf Conflict Theory. In a nutshell, Ralf brings into the limelight, the significant vital aspects of such conflict-related demonstrations, which expounds on social transformation as a ubiquitous occurrence. In such a way, he expands an individual's understanding of life-linked conflicts using different facets that depicts sociocultural feuds as a challenge that exists within and between varied elements of society (Dahrendorf et al., 2006). The majority of learners, sociological researchers, philosophical professionals, right and justice fighters, and other human rights embracers apply and incorporate the Dahrendorf's Conflict Theory. This makes them comprehend that all elemental aspects of a given society either initiate and contribute to specific conflicts in one way or the other. Additionally, the concept enlightens the public about the susceptibility of one society to constrain the other through members' social order and division.

With continual reading and contemplation of the Dahrendorf's theory by the public, people have correctly understood their roles in society. They have been able to identify the redundant inhumane subjections like police hostility and racism, among other social evils. Just as postulated by Dahrendorf, victims have continuously understood that life is mostly incorporated with conflicts rather than consensus, which originates from the unequally distributed norms, societal rejections among members, and diversity in norms and values (Dahrendorf et al., 2006). Being a sociological professional, Dahrendorf would have considered the recent cases of police brutality and racism as totally unpalatable inhumane practices, which would inevitably attract massive socio-political tension for immediate transformative and corrective measures.

Conclusion

Conclusively, the Ralf Dahrendorf's Conflict Theory has myriads of vitalities towards the public's tensional influence, which accompanies assumptions essential in understanding social competition, transformative revolutions, and structural inequalities, and ideological comparisons. In such a way, the public can improvise better remedies to the recurrent racial conflicts, among other challenges in making the world a conducive environment for human life- mutual societal coexistence.

References

Dahrendorf, R., Collins, R., & Further, S. (2006). Conflict and Critical Theories. Available on: http://www. pineforge. com/upm-data/13636_Chapter7. pdf. [Accessed on 6th October 2009]. https://www.corwin.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/13636_Chapter7.pdf

Tittenbrun, J. (2013). Ralph Dahrendorf’s conflict Theory of social differentiation and elite theory. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 6(3), 117-140. http://www.iiass.com/pdf/IIASS-volume6-number3-article7.pdf

Weingart, P. (1969). Beyond Parsons? a critique of Ralf Dahrendorf's conflict theory. Social Forces, 48(2), 151-165. https://academic.oup.com/sf/article-abstract/48/2/151/2228672