Descartes on God: Relying on Faith or Cognitive Roundabout? - Essay Sample

Introduction

When it came to meditation, we get a particular philosopher by the name Descartes. In the first cite, he begins with the considerations about the reality of God. He argues the presence of God takes to be confirmed theoretically. Besides the scriptural confidence that the existent of God is through the ideas and scriptures, considering the making of the non-believers. If this happens, the advocates could be defendant of making spherical cognitive. When believers say that they must trust in God because of the scriptures or because God inspires the word. Descartes, the philosopher, further indicates that the very own scripture is, at some point, an indication of how a man can discover God, (Hougen, Christian, and Martin Ovens 1). His main aim is to demonstrate these two facts in a rational manner in which the evidence will have to result in a clear evident. In his Discourse on Method, Descartes explains how he formulated the two questions, which include the issue about the being of God and existence of the depth. During this time, he does not end up well, whereby he receives objections in a lot of questions which he asked. The first objection is on his conclusion, where he accomplishes that the spirit of a personality is something that contemplates keeping all the other countryside. To this, Descartes states that he is a thoughtful item, and he has no different awareness where he accomplishes that there is no spirit of self.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

The second objection is that of having an idea that is clearer than the one's self whereby what follows is a conclusion that states that it exists. Descartes goes beyond the horizon by convincing us to, "we ascribe to God affections that are human, or we attribute so much strength and wisdom to our concentrations." He argues in considering God as unfathomable and immeasurable differing from our minds, which are imperfect and determinate.

Meditations are in several categories and levels. The first meditation is:

Meditation 1; Regarding Those Belongings That Can Be Christened into Hesitation

To begin with, this type of meditation is known as titled as what can be christened into uncertainty", this type of consideration reflects on the number of false in which the meditator has believed in and the wrongness he has built from the body of knowledge in which he has erected from the falseness. The meditator has to make a solution destroying all of all that he has believed in and begin again in creating a new start on a new foundation, (Yazdi, Aqdas, and Raiyyih Shafi'i2). It is believed that whatever the meditator has accepted as an actual value, it means that he has learned something new through his sanities. He admits that at some point, mind can be deceiving but solitary in admiration to some objects which are so tiny and relatively far away, thus the sensory part of the know pretend ledge is sturdy. A meditator argues that the insane /mad people are at some point more deceived, and since he is not one of him, nothing to worry about. However, the meditator is convinced that when hen, he is dreaming he is in the real world, and he sees the actual pictures. Through all this facts he concludes that

Even if he can doubt some things like composite things, he can, at some point, never doubt the universal parts in which they resemble the shapes they represent. The meditator tries to keep his thoughts. He resolves by pretending that these views are untruthful and considers them as fantasy to make his technique of thoughtful as a habit as usual, (Bateman, Chris 1). The mediator supposes it is not because of God but certain evil spirits which have dedicated to him so that the whole thing that comes in mind is considered false. It concludes that by doubting everything, he is at a position of not being led by the demon.

Mediation II; regarding the flora of the hominid mind; this indicates that an account is more recognized than the figure.

In this case, Descartes says that the only access ha we have towards the earth is the access through ideas; he continues by saying that the worldly things are only accessed through indirect means. These ideas are understood in a manner that enables them to be recognized and includes all of the contents in mind, which includes perception, memories, believes ideas, etc... Descartes argues that in this case, the world exists separately, and there is a need for bridges to connect the gaps and provide valid reasons which represent the outside world are accurate.

Regarding God, That he exists

Descartes states that when it comes to ideas, there are three different types of plans; there are adventitious ideas, innate ideas, and fictitious ideas. To begin with, Descartes describes each concept by stating that factious opinions are ideas that always come from what we imagine something looks like. Innate ideas are described as ideas which are within us, they are inbuilt ideas, and the last type of designs is adventitious ideas, this is the ideas which come from the adventure of our day to day life, they come from the world. Descartes argues that when it comes to God, the purposes of God are innate and that they are implanted in the interior us by God himself, and he rejects that the views of God are adventitious or invented.

Descartes presents two arguments about ideas in which he states that:

There is nothing that comes out of nothing; he argues that the cause of view must, at some point, have a reality in the pictures. An example is the infinite idea from God in which he states that the concept of God has infinite recognized authenticity. No one can be a reason of an endless idea since no one is a perfect being. He makes a realization that since God has a formal infinite reality; he must exist as so he is the source of the idea of God. He concludes by stating that God is benevolent, and for so being, he cannot deceive and cannot permit anyone to err without a warning and correction measures.

In the second argument, Descartes states that:

He exists, and his existence must have an ultimate cost, and the only final causes are as follows. Himself, his life, his parents, something less than God and God himself. Descartes argues that if he had created himself, he would have made himself perfect, and since he is a depending agent, no sense is being made since he has to be sustained by someone else, (Minister, Prime 51). Since you have to be supported or depend on someone else, then these indications to a countless regress. And so the idea of faultlessness which happens in him cannot have been initiated from someone who is not perfect. And therefore, he concludes that God does exist. Descartes argued that in his existence, he had ideas of God since his ideal sense of a perfect being could not have been caused by anything rather than the ideal person. And by this point, we get to know that "I" and "GOD" exist.

Meditation IV; concerning the true and false

In this consideration, Descartes urges that if God is a perfect supernatural creature and to add on the spring of all that is needed, then in what way comes that there are a wrongful error and untruth? All these questions are answered in this meditation about truth and false.

In this argument, the facts are based on the great chain of being, and it is said that God's perfect ways are relative in his perfect people. It s believed that error is a result of evil, which is considered as an absence of what is correct.

Here we get to know well about the Descartes second exegetical criterion:

In this case, we all know that Descartes tests are aimed at discriminating, the minded owned from the amended ones. According to Descartes, though, an act of thinking and reasoning is the exclusive work designed for the mind, so the tests are intended to discriminate the thinkers from the non-thinkers, (Ding, John Zijiang.117). For Descartes so, "thoughts are simply the passions and the actions of the mind or soul." We get to understand that for Descartes, our discernments are uttered in language, and wishes comprehended in activities. Descartes calculated his linguistic test to stop separate units that are conscious of the non-perceptive ones, and his exploit exam was to demarcate between the go-betweens with violation from the ones without breach. Descartes states clearly that if you are going to substitute the term movement from the term action, you will have an insightful impression overdue the act test, which is took into relief by Descartes. He trusts that once it is practical to humanlike creatures and faunas, his experiment in act nevertheless imperfect in a complete intelligence is completely delicate and completely precise of attention.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Descartes argues that if a machine were made having a shape and an appearance like that of some animals like monkeys who do not have minds, and then it could be very difficult for them to be identified from the specimens found in nature. He adds that if they were created an outlook like that of a human being, then it could be straightforward to distinguish machines from human characters due to its inability to talk, ( Hiller, Jack H 1). Descartes also admits that humans and animal bodies can be understood best to be like the "machines made on earth which God forms." He states that just like a wall clock whereby it is followed employing configuration and through the motion of its hands, it is assumed to be similar to human and animal parts. The four meditations have been subdivided, whereby the two which are beginning employed the so called skeptical methodic doubt which wrapped up that only ego and thoughts which are indubitable and have been named to have a very great impact in the history of philosophy. They are highly considered as a tool to the modernity and it is a UN avoidable the very first step any modern way of philosophical thinking.

References

Hougen, Christian, and Martin Ovens. "Humor and the Human Condition: An Apple from the Tree." (2018).

Ding, John Zijiang. "The spread and impact of Cartesian philosophy in China: historical and comparative perspectives." Asian Philosophy 28.2 (2018): 117-134.

Hiller, Jack H. "Space, Time, & Consciousness (Part 7): An Absolute Limitation to the Rational Analysis of Experience, Consciousness, & World Origin-The Principle of Interior Unknowability." Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research 10.7 (2019).

Minister, Prime. "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Climate of France)." Religion (2016): 51.

Bateman, Chris. Wikipedia Knows Nothing. Lulu. com, 2016.

Yazdi, Aqdas, and Raiyyih Shafi'i2. "Dualism of the Soul and the Body in the Philosophical System of Ibn Sina and Descartes." Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies (JCIS) http://jcis. ut. ac. ir 1.2 (2019).