Democratic Party: Weakness or Strength? - Essay Sample

Introduction

A strong party gets defined by its ability to formulate consensus instead of policies. Their main aim should be on better outcomes of the systems incorporating programs implementation that serves the interest of most if not all voters (Kollman, 2018). Furthermore, their policies should be limited to voters who can get harmed if democrats are casting their votes against other democrats. The essay will elaborate more on why the Powell amendment signifies a weak democratic party

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

And none republicans on the first model we see that at the start of 1879, it indicated an example of a week party until 1927 where it started to peak with the parties coming together for the voter's interest-the way the schedule gets carried out where the speaker puts forward the bill to the hostile panel. What does Kollman (2018) suggest the effect of Powell's amendments on making democratic parties strong or weak? Powell amendments make the democratic parties vulnerable, as the paper discusses.

Furthermore, the bill gets voted via a closed rule with no room for any amendment. In the house of the senate, the majority leader can put forward a bills amendment and ensure that it outshines the initial bill. Also, he can voice a motion that is none debatable to the table (Kollman, 2018). The killer amendments have had a severe effect on parties where it splits members of the majority. That has a result of making the bill to be dead.

Killer amendments bring inequality or favoritisms as when a bill goes to the house of the senate for a vote. A segment of the party will be in favor of the amendment provided it favors people of their constituents. The party in opposition will approve the change as they know it will render the bill useless. The leaders can manipulate the house debate to favor their interests rather than be in favor of the voter's welfare.

The Powell amendment signifies a weak democratic party as meant by the different grading related to issues of the voter. The northern democrat and southern democrat have an excellent dispersal of services when it comes to funding the school. In contrast, the Republican has terrible grades in school funding. On desegregation, for a northern democrat is remarked well with southern bad and republican indifferent. In union, northern democrats have an excellent remark, while for the south democrat is mediocre and the republican bad.

The paper argues that this is a weak democratic party. It's because of the differences parties have in the conduct of policy making and their ability not to be unified on their service delivery. Furthermore, the first coalition party's performances do not improve even when they get voted once more into power. The parties have divided the state into classes of sub-electorates, subsubelectorates, and so forth. This stratification tears apart state, meaning that some government services might not reach them or not fully implemented.

On the national branding of the parties, we see that the party refuses to come to terms with the national branding internally. Congress gets made up of incumbents and less representation of women and too many lawyers and a considerable number of people with lots of money. During elections of congress in 1842, the law passed was to regulate gain by democrats, but in 1967 the law was changed that aimed at safeguarding the benefit (Kollman, 2018).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is an example of a weak democratic party. Furthermore, most parties are not able to win the voter's hearts during elections. There is less representation of women in congress and evident self-thinking of parties for their gain rather than thinks of the voter's interest and profit. A robust democratic party considers voters' interest with minimal self wants to gain over the people's attention. Powell amendments make parties weaker.

References

Kollman, K (2018).The American Political System (3rd ed). The University of Michigan.