Contemporary International Peace-Building Essay

Cahill, D. (2014, 1) states that neoliberalism is a policy and an ideology model which emphasizes the value of the competition of the free market. Though there has recently been a massive debate as to the defining aspects of neoliberal practice and thought, it is most generally linked to laissez-faire economics. Neoliberalism is categorized explicitly regarding its certainty in unrelenting economic development as the means to attain human advancement (Canagarajah, S. 2016, 5). It also recognized as the assurance in free markets as the most effective allocation of resources, its prominence on limited state intervention in social and economic affairs as well as its devotion to the liberty of capital and trade.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

On the other international peace-building strategies improve the possibilities of a civil war or conflicts being resolved. Peace-building tackles the local origins of hostilities, the native capabilities for change, as well as the precise degree of universal commitment obtainable to contribute to change (Ginty, R.M. 2013, 199). For instance, the United Nations have peace-building operations which result in a positive change. The UN peacekeeping policies are positively connected with various processes of democratization after significant conflicts, and multidimensional implementation operations are generally useful in ending the conflicts. According to Peterson, J. (2014, 3), peacekeeping strategies form a social expectation for diplomatic conflict resolution and strengthen the society socioeconomically and politically.

Civil wars are currently the leading form of war in the modern universe and how to handle and solve such conflicts wars is a hugely significant concern for the global society. In a progressively globalized world, civil wars can result in global and regional instability which should not be overlooked because it may lead to global repercussions. Since conflicts and the economy are closely related, struggle to obtain to resources arises during civil wars (Peterson, J. 2014, 1). Thus sustainable peace between and within communities is necessary; however, it is only possible when every individual is given fair access to resource accumulation prospects and acquire a sustainable livelihood, together with general security, justice, and well-being in a setting of good governance.

Countries which are affected by civil wars or constantly have institutional instability, their nature of economic growth assume even more significance. Thus, contemporary international peace-building operations all over the world are being implemented to support economic progress in countries susceptible to wars.

Peace-building operations have been currently defined as 'transmission instruments' of neoliberal representations of a nation. Other than being far from neutral and technical exercises in civil war management, multidimensional peace-building missions develop free-market democracy as the model preferred for domestic supremacy, developing a 'universal insurrection of Western liberalism' (Ansorg, N and Kurtenbach, S. 2016, 3). Therefore, contemporary international peace-building replicates the neoliberal ideology of that produce real capitalism in the world.

Currently, contemporary peace-building strategies are encouraging nations to include measures of economic and political liberalization into peace treaties. It is also offering technical assistance in the writing of the constitution and other tasks of supremacy, imposing economic and political conditionality on nations in return for financial and other support as well as executing governance roles in failed or transitional state settings.

Similar to neoliberalism, international peace-building may be viewed as one of the many mechanisms which are necessary for the advancement of 'neoliberal state,' or the conversion of sovereign countries into bodies which support the trade liberalization plan of globalized capital (Rodan, G, and Hughes, C. 2014, 32). For the past few years, peace-building strategies have assisted in the expansion of the global economy in several countries.

Peace-building intercession like intercontinental initiatives, for instance, global trade treaties and multidimensional advancement loaning, have assisted in reproducing neoliberal economic strategies. In contrast to the financial and global trade institutions, nonetheless, peace-building approaches support economic liberalization as one of the ways of encouraging economic development which will, in turn, decrease violent conflicts around the globe.

Nations that are generally great at risk of conflicts also experience elevated levels of inequality and peace-building policies which promote economic growth can be used to resolve this problem. The decrease in the rate of poverty increases economic growth (McKay, A.D and Thorbecke, E. 2015, 233). The benefits of economic development in the world spill out to developing countries and create other social reimbursements like environmental developments and a decrease in poverty. Therefore, when economic liberalization produces growth and development aids in decreasing inequality in nations, then economic liberalization is a good strategy recommendation for war-ravaged societies.

Moreover, peace-building approaches make sure that prosperous countries sustain peace treaties at the local levels and that they preserve global and regional security and peace. To add, just like neoliberalism, when peace-building policies adjust borrowing policies and these strategies successfully transform the developing countries to 'neoliberal nations,' power is shifted away from consumers, workers, and representative institutions and towards export industries and international stakeholders. Additionally, it also decreases the governing role and capacities of the nation while increasing the impact of global investors and international markets in the community.

Another dominant strategy of contemporary international peace-building is that multilateral security and peace is improved through the promotion of global capitalism (Opacin, N. 2014, 18-19). Peace treaties promote countries which are susceptible to war to become more assimilated into a spirited international capitalist economy. With the promotion of global capitalism, the development of economic growth has increased as well as the promotion of new technological innovations.

One of the most significant contemporary international peace-building operations is market liberalization. Promoting market liberalization, in turn, increases a nation's chances to gain access to world markets by way of encouraging economic growth. Thus, trade liberalization is a potent prescription for assisting developing countries to develop from the traps of conflict. Furthermore, also connected to the governance models preferred by market liberalization supporters are strategies which decrease national regulatory capabilities thus expanding opportunities and incentives for international investment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, contemporary international peace-building operations reflect the neoliberal ideology that encourages assertive capitalism. They reinvent conditions for stability and peace and increase the ability of nations to cope with crisis and reestablish society. With all the strategies of peace-building such as market liberalization, economic growth occurs which solves the fundamental issue of inequality that triggers a rise to conflicts. But most importantly, the strategies of peace-building are efficient at encouraging peace where multidimensional security and peace may be improved through globalized capitalism.

References

Ansorg, N and Kurtenbach, S. (2016). Institutional Reforms and Peacebuilding: Change, Path-Dependency and Societal Divisions in Post-War Communities. Taylor & Francis, pp. 3.

Cahill, D. (2014). The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1.

Canagarajah, S. (2016). Translingual Practices and Neoliberal Policies: Attitudes and Strategies of African Skilled Migrants in Anglophone Workplaces. Springer, pp. 5.

Ginty, R.M. (2013). Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding. Routledge, pp. 199.

McKay, D. A, and Thorbecke, E. (2015). Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current and Emerging Issues. Oxford University Press, pp. 233.

Opacin, N. (2014). China's Role in Afghanistan: A Capitalist Peace Approach. diplom.de, pp. 18-19.

Peterson, J. (2014). Building a Peace Economy? Liberal Peacebuilding and the Development-Security Industry. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-3.

Rodan, G, and Hughes, C. (2014). The Politics of Accountability in Southeast Asia: The Dominance of Moral Ideologies. OUP Oxford, pp. 32.