Celebrities Entitlement to Private Life Essay

Introduction

The first amendment provides the United States residents the right of the press, and celebrities get highly visible to individuals utilizing this entitlement (Kasson, 2015). The media spends the better part of their career in numerous efforts to provide their listeners and readers stories concerning the private and public lives of the celebrities. However, it is prudent that celebrities be able to retain their secretive lives out of the press and safe.

Is your time best spent reading someone else’s essay? Get a 100% original essay FROM A CERTIFIED WRITER!

Save 25%

Impacts of a Celebrity Life

Jones, 2015, argues that too much publicity has negative effects on some of the celebrities. Research studies reveal the association between the negative psychological impacts as a result of the publicity on the social media as well as the paparazzi. According to Kasson, 2015, most celebrities suffer the loss of difficulties, lost sense of personality, imposter syndrome (due to the sentiment that one does not merit the triumph as well as the pursuit for media limelight impermanence) and absence of privacy. For this reasons, celebrities may develop a negative mind state concerning their personalities and have the distress of disappearing in the public eye or even lack confidentiality outside their residence. Lawrence Jennifer once confessed that "I realized the paparazzi would be a reality in whole my life....However, I never gathered that I would feel anxious each time I would open my front door or be chased by a group of more than ten men whom I had never met, one feels invaded and scared, in fact, it makes my adrenaline go bad each day" (Kasson, 2015). In respect to Lawrence's confession, one can gather the aspect of nervousness which is distressful or makes people have an uneasiness in their mind due to the fear of misfortune or danger.

Hence Lawrence Jenifer suffers from anxiety because of the absence of confidentiality outside her house. Jennifer is among the list of several other celebrities who suffer from distress as a result of their occupation, but it this is not right since no person should suffer due to their job.

Rules and Regulations Concerning Taking Photographs

Federal regulations exist vis-a-vis taking photos concerning normal individuals. Among some of the States, one cannot take personal information regarding people or take pictures without consent, but this does not appear to have any influence on the paparazzi. According to the "Legitimate Matters in Photographing Persons," within the Missouri State, the photographer will be accountable in a civil activity whenever he or she takes a person's picture and in conducting this act violates this individual's privacy right (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015). If the person takes and utilizes the image of a celebrity or enters an individual's property without consent, then the photographer will be charged with trespassing even if the paparazzi or press journalist took the photo form a public location. Specific regulations subsist regarding what professional photographers require to adhere to whenever they take a picture of individuals. The celebrities merit to be treated similarly to any other person present in the street, however for celebrity photographers; it appears like the paparazzi neglect these rules (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015).

Celebrities' confidential lives attract interest in the social media platforms, the press as well as the public domain, however, that does not grant any person the right to meddle to acquire stories and pictures of the celebrities 'reserved lives. There exists the dialogue of reasonably or not the first U.S. amendment safeguards paparazzi and press revealing and narrating the confidential lives of celebrities. The right to speech and the right to press are all provided to the United States citizens, though it neither states that the photography is inclusive or a requirement of either of those rights. Mednick et al. 2018, indicates that the boundary of non-consensual photos, when illegitimately not concerned with the public domain can be limited. In all actuality, non-consensual photographs without true public interest should indeed be limited. "Former star of Friends, Aniston Jennifer, bared all the publicity back in the year 1999 when she was basking topless in her own home (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015).

An obsessional photographer scaled her neighbor's hedge and took her picture with a highly-tech lens camera and later sold it. Eventually, numerous magazines published her photos. The paparazzi intrude Aniston's Jennifer's confidentiality since the fact that she was in her own home meant not a matter of public concern (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015). Even though the first amendment issues the U.S. citizens the right of press and speech, it is of no valid interest to the public stories and pictures without permission is not right (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015).

The Contribution of the Press and Paparazzi to Celebrities' Challenges

Sometimes the paparazzi and press take extensive measures to publish lifetime stories, for instance, the New York Times magazine once published a story concerning Tori Spelling and Chris Brown car chase victims when the paparazzi intensely followed them only to cause a car crash as they slammed into a wall (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015). The narrative if princes Diana deadly run is supposedly one of the worst a tragic cases of the paparazzi chase. A team of photographers followed Fayed Dodi and her friend princes Diana, in 1997, as the driver tried to lose the team, he lost control of the car resulting in a car crash inside the tunnel, hence the demise of Fayed Dodi, the driver, and princess Diana. Princess Diana's tale as well as the fact that the paparazzi simply watched as they took photographs serve as the definitive proof which surrounds the celebrities' confidential lives. The public harassment by the press and paparazzi that causes them to worry regarding their lives in the public sphere (Grindstaff& Murray, 2015).

Conclusion

Conclusively, the examples mentioned above demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that celebrities' spotlight has negative effects on them. However, there are rule and regulations concerning the taking of photographs of the normal day persons, which also ought to be applied to the celebrities. The press and paparazzi have no right to intrude the celebrities' private lives since the celebrities must also enjoy a private life safe and away from the public scrutiny.

References

Jones, B. (2015). Book review: celebrity capital: assessing the value of fame by Barrie Gunter. LSE Review of Books. Retrieved from: blogs.lse.ac.uk/.../book-review-celebrity-capital-assessing-the-value-of-fame-by-barrier.

Grindstaff, L., & Murray, S. (2015). Reality celebrity: Branded affect and the emotion economy. Public Culture, 27(1 (75)), 109-135. Retrieved from: www.citethisforme.com/.../economics/celebrity%20economy%20set%20for%20%20e...

Hamad, H. (2018). Celebrity in the contemporary era. In Routledge Handbook of Celebrity Studies (pp. 56-69). Routledge. Retrieved from:

Kasson, J. S. (2015). Buffalo Bill's Wild West: Celebrity, Memory, and Popular History. Hill and Wang. Retrieved From: digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3329&context.

Mendick, H., Ahmad, A., Allen, K., & Harvey, L. (2018). Celebrity, Aspiration and Contemporary Youth: Education and Inequality in an Era of Austerity. Bloomsbury Publishing. Retrieved from: https://www.bloomsbury.com/.../celebrity-aspiration-and-contemporary-youth-97814...